On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 17:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1?
>>
>> I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 00:22:57 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Montag 16 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 wi
On Montag 16 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon
>
> wrote:
> > > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1?
> >
> > I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mys
On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1?
>
> I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql 5.0.84-r1 (once I
> figured out how to get amarok to _not_
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1?
I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql 5.0.84-r1 (once I
figured out how to get amarok to _not_ use the embedded mysql)
--
Douglas J Hunley, RHCT
doug.hun...@gm
5 matches
Mail list logo