Many thanks, Walt,
your patches work just fine for me.
Helmut.
On 04/16/2012 08:45:14 PM, walt wrote:
On 04/16/2012 06:09 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about patches for the ATI-drivers 12.3 to work
with git-sources 3.4_rc3 ?
Well, "patch" is too formal for the
On 04/16/2012 06:09 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about patches for the ATI-drivers 12.3 to work with
> git-sources 3.4_rc3 ?
Well, "patch" is too formal for the ugly hack I use :)
After building your new kernel you should patch one kernel header file
before building
On 08/27/2011 06:37 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know about an ati-driver for the new xorg-server-11.0
system. Is there an experimental drivers as it used to be.
There isn't one right now. AMD usually supports the X.Org version that
Ubuntu is shipping in its next version. The
On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers.
>
> On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Volker Armin Hemmann"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers.
On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Volker Armin Hemmann"
To:
Sent: Friday, No
On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers.
>
> On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote:
> > В сообщен
- Original Message -
From: "Volker Armin Hemmann"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers.
On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote:
В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras
написал:
> On 11/
On Freitag 13 November 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote:
> > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin Hemmann
> >
> > написал:
> >> [...]
> >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the
> >> instructions.
> >
> >
On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote:
> В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras
>
> написал:
> > On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote:
> > > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin
> > > Hemmann
> > >
> > > написал:
> > >> [...]
> > >> yea
В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras
написал:
> On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote:
> > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin Hemmann
> >
> > написал:
> >> [...]
> >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the
On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote:
В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin Hemmann
написал:
[...]
yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the
instructions.
I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no ebuilds to
satisfy "=x11
Igor rambler.ru> writes:
> I would use kde-base/kwifimanager-3.5.10 every now and then to check
> networks,
> IP address, or strength of signal when I would not use iwconfig or iwlist.
> This will be removed soon, so what is the KDE4 equivalent?
Great timing, as I need to revisit my wireless
Nikos Chantziaras arcor.de> writes:
<*> ATI Radeon display support │ │
│ │[*] DDC/I2C for ATI Radeon support (NEW) │
│
│ │[*] Support for backlight control (NEW)
Thanks.
James
Ward Poelmans gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, change your xorg.conf. Change 'Driver "fglx"' to 'Driver "radeon"'.
thanks,
James
On 09/21/2009 08:10 PM, James wrote:
Hello,
Currently, on an old laptop I have this chip:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc
Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
using ati-drivers, all if fine with:
xorg-server-1.5.3-r5
ati-drivers-8.593
#
On Sonntag 07 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sonntag 07 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
> >>> Good Day;
> >>>
> >>> ati-drivers fails to emerge; foolowed the somewhat out of date doc's
> >>> online.
> >>
> >> There do
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 07 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
Good Day;
ati-drivers fails to emerge; foolowed the somewhat out of date doc's
online.
There doesn't exist a Catalyst for Linux release yet that support kernel
2.6.29. Even if you ins
On Sonntag 07 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
> > Good Day;
> >
> > ati-drivers fails to emerge; foolowed the somewhat out of date doc's
> > online.
>
> There doesn't exist a Catalyst for Linux release yet that support kernel
> 2.6.29. Even if you install the l
Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
Good Day;
ati-drivers fails to emerge; foolowed the somewhat out of date doc's
online.
There doesn't exist a Catalyst for Linux release yet that support kernel
2.6.29. Even if you install the latest version (9.5), it won't work.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:14:40 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arttu V. wrote:
> > On 11/24/08, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Montag 24 November 2008, Christian wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I wanted to update my kernel to 2.6.26-r3 today. But th
Arttu V. wrote:
On 11/24/08, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Montag 24 November 2008, Christian wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to update my kernel to 2.6.26-r3 today. But the ati-drivers
version 8.501 won't compile.
is there a good reason to use acient drivers?
They're the lates
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 16 November 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I can't figure out how to fix this. emerge ati-drivers gives this:
[ebuild N] x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r1 USE="acpi -debug"
74,042 kB
[blocks B ] x11-drivers/ati-drivers (is blocking
x11-base/xorg-
On 9/3/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > I suspect that ATI has integrated an existing VGA core into a new
> > chipset.
>
> yep
>
>
> > I stick with the radeon driver if I want any real support.
>
> That driver did not work either
>
> It's a wait
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
> I suspect that ATI has integrated an existing VGA core into a new
> chipset.
yep
> I stick with the radeon driver if I want any real support.
That driver did not work either
It's a waiting game. One day, when googling, I'll find a post about that
chi
On 9/3/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>
> > > Dell Inspiron 1721 is based on AMD ATI M690T chipset, Turion 64 X2 dual
> > > core
> > > processors with speeds from 1.8GHz to 2.2GHz, and ATI Mobility Radeon
> > > X1270
>
>
> > > so How/where do I read w
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
> > Dell Inspiron 1721 is based on AMD ATI M690T chipset, Turion 64 X2 dual core
> > processors with speeds from 1.8GHz to 2.2GHz, and ATI Mobility Radeon X1270
> > so How/where do I read which chipsets are covered by which drivers?
> I would personally visit
On 9/2/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > You need to discover with lspci what ATI controller is in the machine
> > and then check which ati-drivers packages support it. After doing that
> > you need to make sure that the ati-drivers package you have chos
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
> You need to discover with lspci what ATI controller is in the machine
> and then check which ati-drivers packages support it. After doing that
> you need to make sure that the ati-drivers package you have chosen
> matches up with the kernel you are attempting to
In gmane.linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 17:17 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> All of the recent ati-drivers seem to have a bug that corrupts
>> contents of some scrolling text windows. It looks like this:
>>
>> http://www.visi.com/~grante/fglrxbug.png
>
> wow, never seen t
On 2006-12-30, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, using your suggestion, I have it x/kde working again, but I get this
> error when I run glxinfo:
>
> libGL error: failed to open DRM: Operation not permitted
> libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
Do you have the section at th
Grant Edwards visi.com> writes:
> > I have a ATI 1900 card:
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc R580 [Radeon X1900
XT] Primary
> > 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc R580 [Radeon X1900 XT]
Secondary
> VIDEO_CARDS="radeon vesa fbdev fglrx"
Well, using your
On 2006-12-29, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm currently testing an 8.28.8-r1 ebuild. Once I'm confident
>> I haven't broken anything, I'll post it.
>
> I have a ATI 1900 card:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc R580 [Radeon X1900
> XT] Primary
> 01:00.1 Display
Grant Edwards visi.com> writes:
> I'm currently testing an 8.28.8-r1 ebuild. Once I'm confident
> I haven't broken anything, I'll post it.
Hello Grant,
I have a ATI 1900 card:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc R580 [Radeon X1900 XT]
Primary
01:00.1 Display controller:
On 2006-12-27, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-12-27, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Grant Edwards HA||UCA:
>>> Is there an ati-drivers ebuild that will install a Radeon
>>> 9200/9250 compatible driver under 2.6.18? The most recent ATI
>>> driver that works with the 9
On 2006-12-27, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards HA||UCA:
>> Is there an ati-drivers ebuild that will install a Radeon
>> 9200/9250 compatible driver under 2.6.18? The most recent ATI
>> driver that works with the 9200 series is 8.28.8, but it (and
>> older versions) won't com
Richard Fish asmallpond.org> writes:
>
> James wrote:
>
> > You certainly seem quite knowledgable on these issues. Do have time
> > for to help me:
>
> I'll try. The real question is, can I do it without posting a 27-page
> message to the list again,as I have been known to do! :->
>
OK, I
James wrote:
> You certainly seem quite knowledgable on these issues. Do have time
> for to help me:
I'll try. The real question is, can I do it without posting a 27-page
message to the list again,as I have been known to do! :->
First, some background and answers to the 'high-level' stuff (I
p
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:08:02PM +, James wrote:
> Well from my xorg.conf:
> Driver "radeon"
> VideoRam65536
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Screen 1"
> Device "Radeon-9000-M9"
> Monitor "LCDwxga"
> DefaultDepth 24
>
> So since I have a 250 on a 9000,
Richard Fish asmallpond.org> writes:
>
> James wrote:
>
> >ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 Lf [FireGL 9000], on a portable.
> >
> >1. Should I switch to ATI OpenGL ? If not what do I loose? Why?
> >
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure you don't need the ATI drivers, the built-in radeon
> driver has 3D
Tim Janssen uwo.ca> writes:
> You could try unmerging ati-drivers and opengl-update and then
> re-emerging them. That approach *usually* works for me.
This did the trick!
Thanks
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Mitko Moshev gmail.com> writes:
> >>Calculating world dependencies ...done!
> >>[blocks B ]
>>x11-base/opengl-update-2.1.1-r1)
> >>What's the trick to do this update?
> The newest ati-drivers are pmasked. That means they are st
Mitko Moshev gmail.com> writes:
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
James wrote:
Edward Catmur catmur.co.uk> writes:
emerge -u ati-drivers
Yea, well just because there is a later version of the ati-drivers
it will not let me update
!!! Error: the
emerge -p ati-drivers
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It looks like portage might be trying to emerge an updated version of
opengl-update which is a dependency of the new ati-drivers but the old
ati-drivers you have are blocking the new opengl-update.
You could try unmerging ati-drivers and opengl-update
Edward Catmur catmur.co.uk> writes:
> emerge -u ati-drivers
Yea, well just because there is a later version of the ati-drivers
it will not let me update
!!! Error: the
45 matches
Mail list logo
