Re: [gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-10-04 Thread James Ausmus
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Cinder wrote: > Thanks again. I was using the e1000 both compiled-in and as a module with > previous posts. I just tried the e1000e out of desperation, but I haven't > tried it as a module. I don't feel that it's the kernel driver but rather > the correct ethernet

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-10-03 Thread Cinder
Thanks again. I was using the e1000 both compiled-in and as a module with previous posts. I just tried the e1000e out of desperation, but I haven't tried it as a module. I don't feel that it's the kernel driver but rather the correct ethernet inter-face is not being created. I'm reading about

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-10-02 Thread James Ausmus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Cinder wrote: > Thanks. Depmod yielded no results. At least as far as I can tell. I tried > with ... > > Code: > # depmod -a ; depmod -e -F > > As I recall "Note: the kernel developers warn that you should not > configure or compile your kernel as root." >-> > ht

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist-

2009-10-02 Thread walt
On 10/02/2009 04:20 AM, Cinder wrote: I recompiled my kernel again with built-in e1000e support. No good. Maybe it's udev? Oops, by grepping through the kernel sources I see that you need the e1000 driver, not e1000e. From your pastebin lspci: Intel Corporation 82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Con

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist-

2009-10-02 Thread Cinder
I recompiled my kernel again with built-in e1000e support. No good. Maybe it's udev? _ Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-10-02 Thread Cinder
Thanks. Depmod yielded no results. At least as far as I can tell. I tried with ... Code: # depmod -a ; depmod -e -F As I recall "Note: the kernel developers warn that you should not configure or compile your kernel as root." >->http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-539024.html And that "that

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-10-01 Thread walt
On 10/01/2009 01:49 AM, Cinder wrote: Can you show the results of `modprobe -v e1000` please? Code: # modprobe -v e1000 FATAL: Module e1000 not found. Try running 'depmod'.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-09-30 Thread Steffen Loos
Cinder schrieb: What is the NIC in the box where eth0 isn't showing up? Intel Corporation 82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller Is the driver in your kernel? No. It's a module (e1000) and I watched it compile. I tried a static driver as well. lspci say's http://pastebin.com/md3578a6 I deleted

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-09-30 Thread Stroller
On 30 Sep 2009, at 11:58, Cinder wrote: What is the NIC in the box where eth0 isn't showing up? Intel Corporation 82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller Is the driver in your kernel? No. It's a module (e1000) and I watched it compile. I tried a static driver as well. lspci say's http://paste

[gentoo-user] Re: device eth0 does not exist

2009-09-30 Thread Cinder
>What is the NIC in the box where eth0 isn't showing up? Intel Corporation 82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller >Is the driver in your kernel? No. It's a module (e1000) and I watched it compile. I tried a static driver as well. lspci say's http://pastebin.com/md3578a6 I deleted etc/udev/rules.d/7