Re: [gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-19 Thread Mick
On Friday, 18 January 2019 20:57:45 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2019-01-18, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2019-01-18, Daniel Frey wrote: > >> As someone else mentioned you can mask grub-mkconfig. I didn't bother, > >> it isn't run automatically. > > > > I should have known that on Gentoo it woul

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-18 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-18, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2019-01-18, Daniel Frey wrote: > >> As someone else mentioned you can mask grub-mkconfig. I didn't bother, >> it isn't run automatically. > > I should have known that on Gentoo it wouldn't be. I ought to think > about starting to switch to grub2. On one

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-18, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 1/17/19 2:52 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead >> fingers... >> >> Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2 >> install? >> >> I really don't want any of the auto-magical, dev

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:34:48 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > I'm not worried about the size, I just don't want any of the > automagical config stuff happening (and would feel safest if it wasn't > even installed). Add grub-mkconfig to INSTALL_MASK in make.conf. Neil Bothwick Don't let your

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:51:20 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > Basically grub2 is a completely inert package. The stuff in /usr/bin > and so on doesn't do anything unless you explicitly run it. The > bootloader reads its config file and does what it says, just like the > old one. The bootloader won'

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-17, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:15 PM Grant Edwards > wrote: >> >> Do all the Gentoo package maintainers promise they'll never run >> grub-mkconfig as part of a any package (even grub:2) install, remove, >> or update? > > I doubt you'd get it in writing but I'd be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:15 PM Grant Edwards wrote: > > Do all the Gentoo package maintainers promise they'll never run > grub-mkconfig as part of a any package (even grub:2) install, remove, > or update? > I doubt you'd get it in writing but I'd be shocked if they ever did. Gentoo doesn't insta

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-17, Jack wrote: > I just copied the ebuild (and required patches) into my local overlay. > Still no grub2 for me in Gentoo. I'll probably do that for now. As long as it keeps working, there's no need to battle with grub2... > (I do use it on other PCs with other distros, and the

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-17, Dale wrote: > I made the switch a good while back.  Even for me, it has been fairly > easy.  I don't recall it ever breaking or giving me trouble.  When I > build a new kernel and get the init thingy in /boot, I run this command > to update grub. > > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/g

[gentoo-user] Re: minimal grub:2 install? [grub:0 being removed]

2019-01-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-01-17, Grant Edwards wrote: > Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2 > install? > > I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I > do what I want, os-probing, hide all the details from the stupid user, > config file generator stuff installed