[gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Jim Ramsay
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Daniel da Veiga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, the world file is a simple way to keep a package version (by > > removing it from world), for instance, I don't wanna upgrade mysql > > with my nightly "emerge -uDN world", so, its not in my world file. > > Isn't there

[gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Jim Ramsay
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Yeah, but this would also prevent fixes in this ebuild. > (ie. if there's a typo or broken dependency) Then you could do: >=dev-db/mysql-4.2 This would allow any mysql-4.1.*, including 4.1.20-r1 and 4.1.99 Though you do raise a good point... it would be nice to specify

[gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Jim Ramsay
Daniel da Veiga wrote: > Take a look at the "~" operator... That's what I get for not RTFM first! >From 'man ebuild': ~ means match any revision of the base version specified. So in the above example (~net-libs/libnet-1.0.2a), we would match versions '1.0.2a', '1.0.2a-r1', '1.0.2a-r2', etc...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Alexander Skwar
Jim Ramsay schrieb: Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Daniel da Veiga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the world file is a simple way to keep a package version (by > removing it from world), for instance, I don't wanna upgrade mysql > with my nightly "emerge -uDN world", so, its not in my world file. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Sure, mask anything higher than the version you want in > >your /etc/portage/package.mask file: > > > > >dev-db/mysql-4.1.20 > > And then put the ebuild you're using into a local overlay. Reason: > Sooner or later, the package might/will be droppe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-07-28 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 7/28/06, Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Yeah, but this would also prevent fixes in this ebuild. > (ie. if there's a typo or broken dependency) Then you could do: >=dev-db/mysql-4.2 This would allow any mysql-4.1.*, including 4.1.20-r1 and 4.1.99 Though you d

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world favorites: pros and cons

2006-08-07 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then you could do: > > >=dev-db/mysql-4.2 > > This would allow any mysql-4.1.*, including 4.1.20-r1 and 4.1.99 > > Though you do raise a good point... it would be nice to specify a "real > upstream version number" differently from the Gentoo "interim