There is a very small web server called "thttpd" which is very
lightweight and lets start serving files very quickly.
It runs on my home router machine with an old Pentium CPU and several
megabytes of RAM and seems to consume about 500 kb of it.
Regards,
Vladimir
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:
Isn't there a kernelland HTTP server? ISTR seeing the option. I don't
know anything about it, though.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, microcai wrote:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/
>
> run with systemd or xinetd
>
>
>
> 于 2011年11月14日 18:05, J. Roeleveld 写道:
>> On Sat, November 12, 2011 2
http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/
run with systemd or xinetd
于 2011年11月14日 18:05, J. Roeleveld 写道:
> On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master
On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master'
>> server share the distfiles dir via NFS?
>>
>> So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit
Its been solved in the past ... designed for just this purpose:
moriah ~ # esearch http-replicator
[ Results for search key : http-replicator ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* net-proxy/http-replicator
Latest version available: 3.0-r2
Latest version installed: 3.0-r2
Size of downl
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:40:08 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master'
> server share the distfiles dir via NFS?
No reason at all, I've been doing it for years without a single
problem.
> So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:24, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
>
> I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP /
> whathaveyouscripting support is needed.
>
> Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but not
> neces
On Nov 12, 2011 8:20 PM, "Florian Philipp" wrote:
>
> Am 12.11.2011 13:40, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> >
> > During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master'
> > server share the distfiles dir via NFS?
> >
> > So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of NFS-shar
On Nov 12, 2011 8:16 PM, "YoYo Siska" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
> > >
> > > * www-servers/boa
> > > Available versions:
> > >
On Nov 12, 2011 8:05 PM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
> > > I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
> > >
> > > * www-servers/boa
> > >
> > > Available versions:
> > >~ 0.94
Am 12.11.2011 13:40, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>
> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master'
> server share the distfiles dir via NFS?
>
> So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of NFS-sharing
> vs HTTP-sharing? The scenario is back-end LAN at the offi
On Saturday 12 November 2011 14:01:54 Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
> > > I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
> > >
> > > * www-servers/boa
> > >
> > > Available versions:
> > >~
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
> >
> > I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
> >
> > * www-servers/boa
> > Available versions:
> >~ 0.94.14_rc21 "~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64" [doc]
>
On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
> > I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
> >
> > * www-servers/boa
> >
> > Available versions:
> >~ 0.94.14_rc21 "~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64" [doc]
> >
On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> I've been using boa just for this purpose for years:
>
> * www-servers/boa
> Available versions:
>~ 0.94.14_rc21 "~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64" [doc]
> Homepage:http://www.boa.org/
> Description: A ve
On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 09:14:27 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 12.11.2011 10:01, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
> >> On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>> What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
> >>
Am 12.11.2011 10:01, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan
> wrote:
>> On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
>>>
>>> I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP /
>>>
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
>>
>> I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP /
>> whathaveyouscripting support is needed.
>>
>> Prefera
On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
>
> I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP /
> whathaveyouscripting support is needed.
>
> Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but not
> n
What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo?
I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP /
whathaveyouscripting support is needed.
Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but not
necessary.
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA M
20 matches
Mail list logo
