On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:17:58AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 17:33:13 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
usually always look to see if ...
Sorry, but I'm having terrible trouble parsing this expression.
--
Rgds
Peter.
Haha, no wonder. In the initial reply I
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 04:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
If that don't work, I may go to Firefox, which is installed anyway, and
Thunderbird. From what I have read I can transfer the emails and such
over from there since they are set up like Seamonkey. That's my
understanding at least. I could be
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:56 +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:17:58AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 17:33:13 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
usually always look to see if ...
Sorry, but I'm having terrible trouble parsing this
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:28:16PM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:56 +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:17:58AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 17:33:13 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
usually always look to see if
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 04:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
If that don't work, I may go to Firefox, which is installed anyway, and
Thunderbird. From what I have read I can transfer the emails and such
over from there since they are set up like Seamonkey. That's my
understanding
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
I don't see any need for excuses, it sounds like fine common English to
me, with the possible exception of a run-on if.
The full sentence was I usually always look to see if Dale has been
involved in a thread if HAL
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:25 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
I don't see any need for excuses, it sounds like fine common English to
me, with the possible exception of a run-on if.
I meant to use the word apology instead of
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Guess it's a keyboard error?
Regards
d
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:42:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
In *nix, no output means no error, so it looks like you've already fixed
it :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable.
- Mark Twain
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dirk Uys wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Guess it's a keyboard error?
Regards
d
Actually this is a Seamonkey error. Seamonkey 1 doesn't work with some
sites, banking mostly, and Seamonkey 2 just loves to send blanks
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:42:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
In *nix, no output means no error, so it looks like you've already fixed
it :)
Actually, I have two problems. The error plus this stinking Seamonkey 2
sending blank messages. I'm headed to the shop to get
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:15:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Mar 16 01:55:54 smoker udevd[1275]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a
future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or
ATTRS{}= to match a parent device,
in /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules:42
There are more but they are
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:15:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Mar 16 01:55:54 smoker udevd[1275]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a
future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or
ATTRS{}= to match a parent device,
in /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules:42
There
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:30:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
Now to go beat up Seamonkey a little bit.
Given the amount of trouble is causes, is it really worth the effort?
There are plenty of good email programs out there.
--
Neil Bothwick
Use Colgate toothpaste or end up with teeth like a Ferengi.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:30:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
Now to go beat up Seamonkey a little bit.
Given the amount of trouble is causes, is it really worth the effort?
There are plenty of good email programs out there.
I think it is a problem from it transferring
100316 Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
In *nix, no output means no error,
so it looks like you've already fixed it :)
Actually, I have two problems. The error
plus this stinking Seamonkey 2 sending blank messages.
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
--
Philip Webb wrote:
100316 Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
In *nix, no output means no error,
so it looks like you've already fixed it :)
Actually, I have two problems. The error
plus this stinking Seamonkey 2 sending blank messages.
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
Not if it uses HAL :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I don't know if I can assimilate one more Borg Tagline!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:44:06PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
Not if it uses HAL :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I don't know if I can assimilate one more Borg Tagline!
Hells to the no.
I use mutt. I can
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:44:06PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
Not if it uses HAL :)
Hells to the no.
I use mutt. I can
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:44:06PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Have you tried Mutt (smile) ?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Mar 16 01:55:54 smoker udevd[1275]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future
udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to
match a parent device, in /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules:42
snip
Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:44:06PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0400, Philip Webb
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:33:13 +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
I usually always look to see if Dale has been involved in a thread if
HAL is mentioned :-)
It's reasonable to assume that if he hasn't been involved in such a
thread, he soon will be :)
--
Neil Bothwick
The three Rs of
James Ausmus wrote:
equery b /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules
r...@smoker ~ # equery b /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules
* Searching for /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules ...
sys-power/nut-2.4.1-r1 (/lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules)
r...@smoker ~ #
I am emerging nut again
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:33:13 +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
I usually always look to see if Dale has been involved in a thread if
HAL is mentioned :-)
It's reasonable to assume that if he hasn't been involved in such a
thread, he soon will be :)
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 20:38:28 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:33:13 +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
I usually always look to see if Dale has been involved in a thread if
HAL is mentioned :-)
It's reasonable to assume that if he hasn't been involved in such a
thread, he
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:25:29 -0500, Dale wrote:
Funny thing is, I don't bring up hal, everyone else does. ;-)
You bring it down :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Bang on the LEFT side of your computer to restart Windows
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:25:29 -0500, Dale wrote:
Funny thing is, I don't bring up hal, everyone else does. ;-)
You bring it down :P
Actually, it sort of did that itself. It broke my rig. I don't take to
much of a liking to something that is broke. ;-)
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:15:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
That isn't just my opinion either. It worked for a lot of people but
for some, it just plain failed to do its thing.
I know, but you're the only one to make a career out of it :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 18: Taped live
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:15:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
That isn't just my opinion either. It worked for a lot of people but
for some, it just plain failed to do its thing.
I know, but you're the only one to make a career out of it :)
I didn't bring hal up. I
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 17:33:13 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
usually always look to see if ...
Sorry, but I'm having terrible trouble parsing this expression.
--
Rgds
Peter.
33 matches
Mail list logo
