>The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
> gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
> didn't.
rt-sources is from some overlay, and probably you are using
OVERLAY_CACHE_METHOD=none
which cannot read SLOT-data calculated in eclasses.
You migh
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
> gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
> didn't.
>
>Any reason for wanting them to look di
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
> gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
> didn't.
>
>Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that
> should be reported to
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
> > mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look t
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
> mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it.
Which version of eix are you using? The output
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
> mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it.
Which version of eix are you using? The output has changed a lot between
0.6.4 (the latest stable) an
On Friday 08 December 2006 19:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
> > > happening.
> > >
> > > Alan - do you use some sort of extra co
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
> happening.
>
> Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
> far more readable.
Nope, it's a default s
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
> happening.
>
> Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
> far more readable.
Nope, it's a default setup, but probaly an outdated default (see other
mail)
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
far more readable.
Thanks,
Mark
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing
> in eix?
>
> Why is a package now shown as
>
> ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
>
> instead of just
>
> ~2.6.19-r1
The second on
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing
> in eix?
>
> Why is a package now shown as
>
> ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
>
> instead of just
>
> ~2.6.19-r1
The second one is the SLOT for that package. Run eix on an uns
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user
type it sure
Mark Knecht wrote:
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
It's showing you the SLOT the package is in. *-sources have the version
as slot, allowing you to install them in parallel, so in that case it's
not very informative. Try eix -e qt, there it m
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user
type it sure seems less readable now.
Thanks,
Mark
lightning ~ #
15 matches
Mail list logo
