Am Montag, 24. November 2008 12:07:55 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
One smalll thing to add: If you decide to use it, there's a Howto under
http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenAFS. Do NOT use the one from gentoo.org, it's
old, outdated and partly incorre
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:50 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:44:06 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
> > I set up an openmosix cluster once using dfs I think. It replicated
> > data just like you want so each exported thread was seeing consistent
> > file space. It did w
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:44:06 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> I set up an openmosix cluster once using dfs I think. It replicated
> data just like you want so each exported thread was seeing consistent
> file space. It did work, but had a few issues ... I think it was
> designed by MS being
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:35:25 schrieb Stroller:
> I suspect I would be optimistic if I hoped for something so
> sophisticated to be readily available, as I am aware that this would
> be problematic to implement. But do you have any suggestions?
Maybe Coda.
Bye...
Dirk
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:35 +, Stroller wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2008, at 11:07, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > ...
> > If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
>
> I would love a file system that transparently replicates over several
> systems - say 2 - 5.
>
> It doesn't need to amalgamate sp
On 24 Nov 2008, at 11:07, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
...
If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
I would love a file system that transparently replicates over several
systems - say 2 - 5.
It doesn't need to amalgamate spare in any way (as BillK requests),
let's just say I just have a
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:03:13 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> Discovered this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems#Distributed_file_systems
>
> Thats going to keep me busy for awhile!
Interesting link. However, NFS, SMB, AFP and NCP are NOT distributed
filesystems. They're
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. November 2008 11:30:25 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
> > By transient storage I mean that the data is duplicated across across
> > physical storage spaces so that if a machine goes down, the data is
> > still available.
>
>
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 11:30:25 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> By transient storage I mean that the data is duplicated across across
> physical storage spaces so that if a machine goes down, the data is
> still available.
OK, thanks.
> I thought Andrews FS did that, but didnt see when
> look
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 07:30 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 23:31:30 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
> > What I would really like is a file system that would unify these spaces
> > and present them to the network as storage space - ideally with
> > redundant data storage
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 23:31:30 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> What I would really like is a file system that would unify these spaces
> and present them to the network as storage space - ideally with
> redundant data storage so one or more machines can dissappear and the
> data is still avai
Currently I have around 3 terrabytes of storage across a number of
gentoo machines (4 at the moment) - at any one time 1/2 to 1 terrabyte
is unused, but mostly in scattered chunks. Some space is exported via
NFS and samba for backups and shared files.
What I would really like is a file system tha
12 matches
Mail list logo