Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 06 November 2008 08:21:26 schrieb ext KH:
>
>
>> Well that's the point. You want to get rid of them. So you are unmerging
>> them. The moment something fails after unmerging and before emerging the
>> new packages, you will be very happy to have your old pac
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
>
>> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
>>
>>> On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
>>>
Alex Schuster schrieb:
> Or you can put buildyspkg into your FEATURES list in make.conf. Then,
>
On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
> > On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
> >> Alex Schuster schrieb:
> >>> Or you can put buildyspkg into your FEATURES list in make.conf. Then,
> >>> whenever a system package is merged, a binary package will be created
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
> On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
>
>> Alex Schuster schrieb:
>>
>>>
>>> Or you can put buildyspkg into your FEATURES list in make.conf. Then,
>>> whenever a system package is merged, a binary package will be created.
>>>
>>> Wonko
>>>
On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 06 November 2008 08:21:26 schrieb ext KH:
> > Well that's the point. You want to get rid of them. So you are unmerging
> > them. The moment something fails after unmerging and before emerging the
> > new packages, you will be ver
On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, KH wrote:
> Alex Schuster schrieb:
> > KH writes:
> >> To be on the save side of gentoo :-)
> >>
> >> quickpkg ss com_err e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
> >
> > Yeah, that saved me some trouble.
> >
> >> imho quickpkg is a good idea whenever changing something which ist pa
Am Donnerstag 06 November 2008 08:21:26 schrieb ext KH:
> Well that's the point. You want to get rid of them. So you are unmerging
> them. The moment something fails after unmerging and before emerging the
> new packages, you will be very happy to have your old packages. You just
> put them pack i
On Donnerstag 06 November 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 05 November 2008 23:26:57 schrieb ext KH:
> > quickpkg ss com_err
>
> That doesn't make sense at all. They're the ones you need to get rid of.
>
> Bye...
>
> Dirk
it is good to have backups - just in case.
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch 05 November 2008 23:26:57 schrieb ext KH:
>
>
>> quickpkg ss com_err
>>
>
> That doesn't make sense at all. They're the ones you need to get rid of.
>
> Bye...
>
> Dirk
>
Well that's the point. You want to get rid of them. So you are unmerging
Alex Schuster schrieb:
> KH writes:
>
>
>> To be on the save side of gentoo :-)
>>
>> quickpkg ss com_err e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
>>
>
> Yeah, that saved me some trouble.
>
>
>> imho quickpkg is a good idea whenever changing something which ist part
>> of system.
>>
>
> Or you can
Am Mittwoch 05 November 2008 23:26:57 schrieb ext KH:
> quickpkg ss com_err
That doesn't make sense at all. They're the ones you need to get rid of.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutsch
KH writes:
> To be on the save side of gentoo :-)
>
> quickpkg ss com_err e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
Yeah, that saved me some trouble.
> imho quickpkg is a good idea whenever changing something which ist part
> of system.
Or you can put buildyspkg into your FEATURES list in make.conf. Then,
when
Markos Chandras schrieb:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008 22:39:52 Denis wrote:
>
>> I did this
>>
>> emerge -f e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
>> emerge -C com_err ss
>>
>> but it still complained about blocks when I tried "emerge e2fsprogs"
>>
>> So I had to do
>>
>> emerge -C e2fsprogs
>> emerge e2fs
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 22:39:52 Denis wrote:
> I did this
>
> emerge -f e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
> emerge -C com_err ss
>
> but it still complained about blocks when I tried "emerge e2fsprogs"
>
> So I had to do
>
> emerge -C e2fsprogs
> emerge e2fsprogs
>
> This seems to work fine - no more
I did this
emerge -f e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs
emerge -C com_err ss
but it still complained about blocks when I tried "emerge e2fsprogs"
So I had to do
emerge -C e2fsprogs
emerge e2fsprogs
This seems to work fine - no more blocks.
Thank you,
Denis
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:16:02PM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> or, simpler with paludis:
>
> paludis -i --dl-blocks discard e2fsprogs
>
> If the block still exists after you unmerged com_err and ss, use emerge with -
> t to find out which package still wants them end re-emerge this first.
It
James Homuth writes:
> Apparently a later version of Portage will correct it, but if you're
> running 2.1.4.5 you're probably fixing it manually. That's been my
> experience anyway.
On the PC I am writing this, portage 2.2 had no trouble with this update.
But on another, which was upgraded to po
On Mittwoch 05 November 2008, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 05 November 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> >> Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 19:08:23 schrieb Denis:
> >> > This probably was already
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch 05 November 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 19:08:23 schrieb Denis:
>> > This probably was already discussed at length... But I keep waiting
>> > for an automatic portage tree
On Mittwoch 05 November 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 19:08:23 schrieb Denis:
> > This probably was already discussed at length... But I keep waiting
> > for an automatic portage tree fix to this... Any idea if there will
> > be a fix, or will I need to take care of
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 19:08:23 schrieb Denis:
> This probably was already discussed at length... But I keep waiting
> for an automatic portage tree fix to this... Any idea if there will
> be a fix, or will I need to take care of this manually? (Intel Core
> Duo 32-bit system, FYI).
emer
-Original Message-
From: Denis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 5, 2008 1:08 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] fix for e2fsprogs BLOCK?
This probably was already discussed at length... But I keep waiting for an
automatic portage tree fix to this
This probably was already discussed at length... But I keep waiting
for an automatic portage tree fix to this... Any idea if there will
be a fix, or will I need to take care of this manually? (Intel Core
Duo 32-bit system, FYI).
23 matches
Mail list logo
