Hi All,
I just upgraded to gcc-4.1.1. gcc-config -l shows that gcc-3.4.5 is still
there:
# gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardened
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopie
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopiessp
[5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-harde
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:29:15 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
first of all, let me mention there's a short defense of top posting ...
at the bottom ;)
have you tried emerge --unmerge =gcc-3.4.5 ? note that equal sign,
it's usually necessary to include that when specifying a version.
I also
Acording to Gentoo Documentation, Portage and Emerge never delete an
existing version of gcc. If you want to do so, simply unemerge it. But be
care. You have to modifiy certain files to make emerge compile with the new
version. See http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml (GCC Updating
Guide
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:46:21 -0600, Dan wrote:
> Whether the reply text goes before or after the message to which it
> replies depends entirely on personal preferance.
writer!
the
not
reader,
the
of
preference
personal
the
on
depends
it
but
Yes,
Top-post even Yoda wouldn't.
--
Neil Bothwick
I
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:29, Mick wrote:
> # gcc-config -l
> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
[SNIP]
> --- Couldn't find 'gcc-3.4.5' to unmerge.
[SNIP]
> If it doesn't exist, why is it listed? There's most likely a good
> explanation for this, but it's getting late and I must be too tired to
>
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:46:21 -0600, Dan wrote:
Whether the reply text goes before or after the message to which it
replies depends entirely on personal preferance.
writer!
the
not
reader,
the
of
preference
personal
the
on
depends
it
but
Yes,
Top-post even Yoda wouldn't.
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:46, Dan wrote:
> have you tried emerge --unmerge =gcc-3.4.5 ? note that equal sign,
> it's usually necessary to include that when specifying a version.
The equal sign isn't necessary for unmerges.
> Usually, if you're following a thread closely, you'll already kno
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just upgraded to gcc-4.1.1. gcc-config -l shows that gcc-3.4.5 is still
> there:
>
> # gcc-config -l
> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
> [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardened
> [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopie
> [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopiessp
>
On 1/9/07, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
scrolltime is also wasted. Therefore, I conclude that although I
respect the opinions of those who choose to bottom-post, and agree with
the reasons it is nice, I also insist that there are also good reasons
to top-post, and that I think the only real so
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 01:40, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:29, Mick wrote:
> > # gcc-config -l
> > [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
> [SNIP]
>
> > --- Couldn't find 'gcc-3.4.5' to unmerge.
> [SNIP]
>
> > If it doesn't exist, why is it listed? There's most likely a
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 09:12, Mick wrote:
> # equery list -e gcc
[SNIP]
> [I--] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3 (4.1)
>
>
> Under /etc/env.d/gcc I see the same that gcc-config -l shows:
[SNIP]
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 292 Mar 30 2006 i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4
11 matches
Mail list logo