On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 17:04:53 CEST Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> aside from that you might want to specify a different IO scheduler for
> the SSD, I do that via udev rules like:
>
> # 60-sched.rules
> # set deadline scheduler for non-rotating disks
> ACTION=="add|change", KERNEL=="sd[a-
aside from that you might want to specify a different IO scheduler for
the SSD, I do that via udev rules like:
# 60-sched.rules
# set deadline scheduler for non-rotating disks
ACTION=="add|change", KERNEL=="sd[a-z]", ATTR{queue/rotational}=="0",
ATTR{queue/scheduler}="deadline"
# set cfq sc
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 21:27:45 CEST Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Stefano Crocco
>
> wrote:
> > Hello to everyone,
> > I just bought a 250 GB SSD and I'm planning to install Gentoo on it. I've
>
> read
>
> > the Gentoo Wiki page on this and searched Goog
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Stefano Crocco
wrote:
>
> Hello to everyone,
> I just bought a 250 GB SSD and I'm planning to install Gentoo on it. I've
read
> the Gentoo Wiki page on this and searched Google for hints on this, but
since
> I found out that much information was either contradictor
Hello to everyone,
I just bought a 250 GB SSD and I'm planning to install Gentoo on it. I've read
the Gentoo Wiki page on this and searched Google for hints on this, but since
I found out that much information was either contradictory or outdated, I'm
asking anyone with first-hand experience on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:57:27 +, Stroller wrote:
> I have recently decided to blame solar flares & cosmic ray induced
> muon showers whenever one of my customers asks why their PC is broken.
We are coming out of a long period of minimal solar activity with
activity expected to hit a high pea
On Monday 22 February 2010 12:57:27 Stroller wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2010, at 07:54, daid kahl wrote:
> > ...
> > As far as I know, solid state devices are much more susceptible to
> > solar flare damage, particularly if you are outside. This is not
> > exactly common, but hey. Of course I also have a
On 22 Feb 2010, at 07:54, daid kahl wrote:
...
As far as I know, solid state devices are much more susceptible to
solar flare damage, particularly if you are outside. This is not
exactly common, but hey. Of course I also have a theory that not an
insignificant number of computer problems are c
On 17 February 2010 06:27, Grant wrote:
>>> I thought SSDs were projected to
>>> last longer than HDs? Also, from what I've read, SLC should last much
>>> longer than MLC.
>>
>> It's the other way round: HD's last longer dan SSD's. [1]
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive#Dis
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:27:22 -0800, Grant wrote:
> I'm troubled by the ever-lurking possibility of an HD failure and I
> thought SSDs would be my way out. Is an HD the best choice for
> reliability?
A single drive, be it HD or SSD, is always at risk of failure. If this is
a significant concern,
Am 16.02.2010 22:27, schrieb Grant:
> It sounds like SSDs don't have the
> projected longevity they did when I researched this a year or so ago.
> I'm troubled by the ever-lurking possibility of an HD failure and I
> thought SSDs would be my way out. Is an HD the best choice for
> reliability?
I
On Dienstag 16 Februar 2010, Grant wrote:
> >> I thought SSDs were projected to
> >> last longer than HDs? Also, from what I've read, SLC should last much
> >> longer than MLC.
> >
> > It's the other way round: HD's last longer dan SSD's. [1]
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state
>> I thought SSDs were projected to
>> last longer than HDs? Also, from what I've read, SLC should last much
>> longer than MLC.
>
> It's the other way round: HD's last longer dan SSD's. [1]
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive#Disadvantages
Thanks for the link. I did some Goo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 22:04, Grant wrote:
> I thought SSDs were projected to
> last longer than HDs? Also, from what I've read, SLC should last much
> longer than MLC.
It's the other way round: HD's last longer dan SSD's. [1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive#Disadvantages
> I'm thinking of re-installing Gentoo on an Intel 40 Megs SSD -- excluding the
> most often writen dirs like /var, /tmp, /home --. What do you think ? I'll be
> glad to hear about previous experiences. What about swap ? Is it safe to have
> it
> on the SSD ?
Why exclude the most written dirs? I
Am 16.02.2010 11:42, schrieb Norman Rieß:
> Am 02/16/10 10:28, schrieb alain.didierj...@free.fr:
>> I'm thinking of re-installing Gentoo on an Intel 40 Megs SSD --
>> excluding the
>> most often writen dirs like /var, /tmp, /home --. What do you think ?
>> I'll be
>> glad to hear about previous exp
On Dienstag 16 Februar 2010, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> I'm thinking of re-installing Gentoo on an Intel 40 Megs SSD -- excluding
> the most often writen dirs like /var, /tmp, /home --. What do you think ?
> I'll be glad to hear about previous experiences. What about swap ? Is it
> safe to h
Am 02/16/10 10:28, schrieb alain.didierj...@free.fr:
I'm thinking of re-installing Gentoo on an Intel 40 Megs SSD -- excluding the
most often writen dirs like /var, /tmp, /home --. What do you think ? I'll be
glad to hear about previous experiences. What about swap ? Is it safe to have it
on the
I'm thinking of re-installing Gentoo on an Intel 40 Megs SSD -- excluding the
most often writen dirs like /var, /tmp, /home --. What do you think ? I'll be
glad to hear about previous experiences. What about swap ? Is it safe to have it
on the SSD ?
19 matches
Mail list logo
