On 27 Oct, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:05:16PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp-
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:21 +0700, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no
files to fetch
from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
Well, sometimes that happens when you build from trunk (and why it's
usually discouraged).
That is not the only
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no files to
fetch
from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
Dunno, perhaps they rely on SVN version. I would try to compile the
code manually, and see if the
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:21 +0700, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no
files to fetch
from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
Well, sometimes that happens when you build from trunk (and why it's
usually discouraged).
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires =0.0.21. Have I any chance
to see this version in ports tree?
Did you try renaming the gegl
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:05:16PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires =0.0.21. Have I any
chance
I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires =0.0.21. Have I any chance
to see this version in ports tree?
--
Regards, Nickolay Hodyunya.
7 matches
Mail list logo