On 02.04.2015 23:21, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I can reemerge, sure. Reboot right now ... not so ideal ...
ok, tried that. didn't change anything.
I can deal with it. It just doesn't work as expected.
On 02.04.2015 23:14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Stefan, this is kinda stupid, but have you tried to re-emerge gummiboot?
nope
gummiboot was emerged here on march, 7th one day before I started
this thread.
I can reemerge, sure. Reboot right now ... not so ideal ...
On Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:06:44 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > # ls -l loader/entries/
> > total 2
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
> > e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. M
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > # ls -l loader/entries/
> > total 2
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
> > e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:
On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> # ls -l loader/entries/
> total 2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
> e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:01
> e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:11 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
[...]
> Canek,
>
> I don't see these long filenames in your filetree-listing.
> You have a directory with the UUID, but then just the kernel-version
numbers.
>
> Or am I looking at the wrong email?
You are:
# tree -l /boot/loader/
/boot/loader
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 11:11:49 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > > > Are the ownership and mode of
> > > > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as
On Monday, March 09, 2015 09:16:35 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 23:20, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> ... why my initrd is 21M is another question ..)
> >
> > Do you have proprietary video drivers in it? fglrx
On 08.03.2015 23:20, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> ... why my initrd is 21M is another question ..)
> Do you have proprietary video drivers in it? fglrx alone is 13 megs and if
> it's for plymouth it doesnt use them so it's just t
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
> > boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
> > confused the bootloader's FAT driver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
> boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
> confused the bootloader's FAT driver and got fixed when you move
On 08.03.2015 21:17, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> fun fact:
>>
>> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
>
> I hate heisenbugs.
;-)
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 8:57:43 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> > kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
>
> fun fact:
>
> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visibl
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> > kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
>
> fun fact:
>
> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at
On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
;-)
On 08.03.2015 18:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> For the sake of testing it, I copied my 3.19.0 entry into a 3.18.9 and
> 3.19.1 entries and rebooted. Here it works fine Stefan (see attached
> image); I don't know why it doesn't with yours.
>
> I see you have some grub related files in your /boo
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>>
>>> Are the ownership and mode of
>>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is i
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> "version"?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
>
> From [1]:
>
> title text to show in the menu
> version version string to append to the title when the title is
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > > Are the ownership and mode of
> > > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> > > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) a
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > Are the ownership and mode of
> > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
> > formatted correctly?
>
> The /boot partition in UE
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are not
> gonna matter that much in that.
Very true. Stupid of me...
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> moved e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf to simply
> "stefan.conf" ... then it gets displayed (and boots fine as well)
>
> maybe we should name the conf-files in a different way?
I listed my "/boot" set up in my pre
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H wrote:
[ ... ]
> "version"?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
>From [1]:
"""
The entry configuration files understand the following keywords:
title text to show in the menu
version version string to append to the title when the title
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >> Are the ownership and mode of
> >> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> >> two others (although I'd as
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> >
> > I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
> >
> > It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot
bootloader.
> >
> > That bootloader
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
>> Are the ownership and mode of
>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
>> formatted correctly?
On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
>
>> Are the ownership and mode of
>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
>> formatted correctly?
>
> Yes, I
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
> Are the ownership and mode of
> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
> formatted correctly?
Yes, I think so:
# ls -l /boot/loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
>
> It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot bootloader.
>
> That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
> ..
Hmm, what is my mistake ...
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot bootloader.
That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
... I can boot the older kernels ... but it d
30 matches
Mail list logo
