Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov schrieb:
It has come to my attention that Reply-To Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
This is wrong. It is *USEFUL*!
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.html
and when I click Reply (Reply to all option does not exist for
Gentoo
Alexander Skwar schrieb:
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov schrieb:
It has come to my attention that Reply-To Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
This is wrong. It is *USEFUL*!
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
Alexander Skwar
--
like:
When being alive at
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote:
My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart
enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly.
Here, here.
Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time. I'm all for leaving it as
it is, 99% of the time, replies to the list's
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote:
My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart
enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly.
Here, here.
Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:21:03AM -0400, John J. Foster wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote:
My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart
enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly.
It has come to my attention that Reply-To Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html .
For example, in my gmail account I see something like this in the
(prettified) header of each message from Gentoo's mailing lists:
From: Marco Fabbri
It has been discussed before and IMHO should not change.
Please if you want to discuss go somewhere else like IRC.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:10:48 -0400
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov wrote:
It has come to my attention that Reply-To Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:10:48PM -0400, Penguin Lover Michael [Plouj]
Ploujnikov squawked:
Who is in charge of the mailing lists and would be the best person to
suggest this to? Should I send this to a different gentoo-* list?
Big discussion over this about 18 months ago.
On 7/31/06, Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has come to my attention that Reply-To Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html .
That is a matter of opinion. I find the Reply-To munging to be very helpful.
Who is
Big discussion over this about 18 months ago.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/120320/focus=120320
Thanks a lot. I didn't find the search functions on the archives sites
very helpful in finding an old thread about this.
The change was made as you suggested, without
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:43:09PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart
enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly.
Here, here.
--
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
pgpa1ta5KFB8F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
