On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:06:27 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 15 November 2009 15:44:16 David Relson wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:29:12 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 November 2009 06:07:59 David Relson wrote:
> > > > The lack of 64-bit buildability for openwatco
On Sunday 15 November 2009 15:44:16 David Relson wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:29:12 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 November 2009 06:07:59 David Relson wrote:
> > > The lack of 64-bit buildability for openwatcom is a whole 'nother
> > > subject and I'm in communication with the
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:29:12 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 15 November 2009 06:07:59 David Relson wrote:
> > The lack of 64-bit buildability for openwatcom is a whole 'nother
> > subject and I'm in communication with the developer about it.
> >
>
> Is this the very famous watcom compile
David Relson schrieb am 15.11.2009 05:07:
>
> Daniel,
>
> A detail I meant to include in my original posting is that I'm
> attempting the build on (and for) a 32 bit machine. So distcc _is_
> the problem.
>
> The lack of 64-bit buildability for openwatcom is a whole 'nother
> subject and I'm in
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:12:31 +0100, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Do you use distcc? Try if the ebuild works with temporary disabling
> distcc. If distcc is to blame, fixing wont be that easy. You have to
> examine build.sh and fix it in order to work with distcc.
Or disable distcc in the ebuild.
Or
On Sunday 15 November 2009 06:07:59 David Relson wrote:
> The lack of 64-bit buildability for openwatcom is a whole 'nother
> subject and I'm in communication with the developer about it.
>
Is this the very famous watcom compiler that's been around longer than MS-DOS
and eventually ended up bein
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:34:46 +0100
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> David Relson schrieb am 14.11.2009 21:33:
> > As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
> > experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
> > quite work :-<
> >
> > The ebuild's src_compi
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:21:50 +0100
Xavier Parizet wrote:
> David Relson a écrit :
> > As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
> > experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
> > quite work :-<
> >
> > The ebuild's src_compile function is:
> >
David Relson schrieb am 14.11.2009 21:33:
> As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
> experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
> quite work :-<
>
> The ebuild's src_compile function is:
>
> src_compile() {
> ./build.sh || die "bu
David Relson schrieb am 14.11.2009 21:33:
> As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
> experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
> quite work :-<
>
> The ebuild's src_compile function is:
>
> src_compile() {
> ./build.sh || die "bu
David Relson a écrit :
> As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
> experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
> quite work :-<
>
> The ebuild's src_compile function is:
>
> src_compile() {
> ./build.sh || die "build.sh failed"
>
As background, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233097 has an
experimental, unsupported ebuild for openwatcom-1.7.1 and it doesn't
quite work :-<
The ebuild's src_compile function is:
src_compile() {
./build.sh || die "build.sh failed"
}
When I run "emerge =dev-lang/openwat
12 matches
Mail list logo
