No, you *add* qt4 to your make.conf if you need it.
You probably still have packages that use qt3, so unless you want to unmerge
them...
Think of it this way. Nobody in their right mind will ever get qt and gtk+
confused. You can have both and intermingle them, and the flags do not depend
on
Just another bullet point of information for the 'can't upgrade to
4.5.2 cause of qt3support' thread. I solved it here by removing 'qt3'
from USE in make.conf. For whatever reason, I had both 'qt3' and 'qt4'
in the USE flag. Removing 'qt3' allowed 'emerge world' to do its
thing.
--
Douglas J
Is there a difference between qt and qt4?
Doug Hunley wrote:
Just another bullet point of information for the 'can't upgrade to
4.5.2 cause of qt3support' thread. I solved it here by removing 'qt3'
from USE in make.conf. For whatever reason, I had both 'qt3' and 'qt4'
in the USE flag. Removing
Yes. The difference is huge.
KDE-3 uses Qt
KDE-4 uses Qt4
They are so different that a name change from Qt to something else would be
entirely acceptable.
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 21:27:12 Anthony Mutiso wrote:
Is there a difference between qt and
So for those that *had* qt in make.conf, (like me), the right thing to
do is to change it to qt4?
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Yes. The difference is huge.
KDE-3 uses Qt
KDE-4 uses Qt4
They are so different that a name change from Qt to something else would be
entirely acceptable.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Anthony Mutisoanm.mlis...@limuru.com wrote:
So for those that *had* qt in make.conf, (like me), the right thing to do is
to change it to qt4?
I think the qt USE flag is deprecated in favor of qt3 and qt4
USE flags and ebuilds should have been updated to use the
On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Anthony Mutisoanm.mlis...@limuru.com
wrote:
So for those that *had* qt in make.conf, (like me), the right thing to do
is to change it to qt4?
I think the qt USE flag is deprecated in favor of qt3 and qt4
USE
7 matches
Mail list logo
