I was having trouble with my standard update world emerge on one of my
machines.
I can't download because I don't have libssl.so.0.9.8. The exact error
msg is
wget: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
I seem to have
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:29:21 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> 3. Other files proved missing as well
>
> I went to another machine which is multilib and copied the libssl from
> the lib32 directory. Then it asked for libcrypto so I copied that
> now it asks for libkrb5.so.3. After a few more it
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I was having trouble with my standard update world emerge on one of my
> machines.
>
> I can't download because I don't have libssl.so.0.9.8. The exact error
> msg is
> wget: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot
>
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:29:21 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> 3. Other files proved missing as well
>>
>> I went to another machine which is multilib and copied the libssl from
>> the lib32 directory. Then it asked for libcrypto so I copied that
>> now it asks for li
Mark Knecht writes:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> I was having trouble with my standard update world emerge on one of my
>> machines.
>>
>> I can't download because I don't have libssl.so.0.9.8. The exact error
>> msg is
>>[[ big snip ]]
>> But clearly some
On Thursday 18 November 2010 19:20:51 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Neil Bothwick writes:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:29:21 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> >> 3. Other files proved missing as well
> >>
> >> I went to another machine which is multilib and copied the libssl from
> >> the lib32 directory
Mick writes:
> On Thursday 18 November 2010 19:20:51 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>
>> Should I now run emerge -e world? If so, I suppose I should stop cron
>> from running an emerge --sync during the night.
>
> I used to do the same with reiserfs, but since I borked badly a reiser4 fs I
> decided i
On 19/11/2010, at 12:57am, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Mick writes:
>>>
>>> Should I now run emerge -e world? If so, I suppose I should stop cron
>>> from running an emerge --sync during the night.
>>
>> I used to do the same with reiserfs, but since I borked badly a reiser4 fs I
>> decided it is
Stroller writes:
> On 19/11/2010, at 12:57am, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> Mick writes:
Should I now run emerge -e world? If so, I suppose I should stop cron
from running an emerge --sync during the night.
>>>
>>> I used to do the same with reiserfs, but since I borked badly a reis
Allan Gottlieb writes:
> Stroller writes:
>
>> On 19/11/2010, at 12:57am, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>> Mick writes:
>
> Should I now run emerge -e world? If so, I suppose I should stop cron
> from running an emerge --sync during the night.
I used to do the same with reiser
On Friday 19 November 2010 05:14:26 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb writes:
> > Stroller writes:
> >> You don't have to chroot to run fsck. You can just boot from the LiveCD
> >> and run `fsck -o -p -t -i -o -n -s /dev/sda1`.
> >>
> >> I feel a bit more confident fscking my root filesyst
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an
>
>emerge -e world
It shouldn't do any harm.
> I do not mind taking this machine offline for the few days of the
> emerge.
There's no need for that, just set PORTAGE_NICENESS=19 in
Mick writes:
> On Friday 19 November 2010 05:14:26 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> Allan Gottlieb writes:
>> > Stroller writes:
>
>> >> You don't have to chroot to run fsck. You can just boot from the LiveCD
>> >> and run `fsck -o -p -t -i -o -n -s /dev/sda1`.
>> >>
>> >> I feel a bit more confident
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an
>>
>>emerge -e world
>
> It shouldn't do any harm.
>
>> I do not mind taking this machine offline for the few days of the
>> emerge.
>
> There's no need fo
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Neil Bothwick writes:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an
>>>
>>> emerge -e world
>>
>> It shouldn't do any harm.
>>
>>> I do not mind taking this machin
Mark Knecht writes:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>>
So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an
emerge -e world
>>>
>>> It shouldn't do any harm.
>>>
>>
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 19 November 2010, Allan
Gottlieb did opine thusly:
> >It seems, however, that you're still going down the path of emerge
> >
> > -e @world. Why is that? If it's just to be confident that everything
> > is back to the way it should be then I unde
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Sounds like the big guns approach, can be valid at times.
I'm usually the first one to chip in about emerge -e world being stupid when
someone reads the gcc upgrade guide, but sometimes you have a box that just
will not fix itself despite hours of troubleshooting. In a case
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 19 November 2010, Allan
> Gottlieb did opine thusly:
>
> > >It seems, however, that you're still going down the path of emerge
> > >
> > > -e @world. Why is that? If it's just to be confide
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:48 on Wednesday 24 November 2010, Kevin
O'Gorman did opine thusly:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 19 November 2010, Allan
> >
> > Gottlieb did opine thusly:
> > > >It seems, howe
On 11/24/10 17:03:34, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:48 on Wednesday 24 November 2010,
> Kevin
> O'Gorman did opine thusly:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 19 November 2010,
> Allan
>
Kevin O'Gorman writes:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 19 November 2010, Allan
>> Gottlieb did opine thusly:
>>
>> > >It seems, however, that you're still going down the path of emerge
>> > >
>> > > -e @world. Wh
22 matches
Mail list logo
