Hi michael,
on Sunday, 2005-12-11 at 23:44:22, you wrote:
Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
like it even better.
www-servers/fnord is probably the smallest that doesn't do ugly things
like tux's processing HTTP at kernel level. I haven't used it but from
2005/12/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
like it even better.
AFAIK ist Boa[1] a very small webserver which has a good speed.
cu
Thomas
[1] http://www.boa.org/
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 12 December 2005 08:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
like it even better.
Should depend on as few other packages as possible.
Should occupy as little memory as possible (both RAM and disk space).
I'm running out
Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
like it even better.
Should depend on as few other packages as possible.
Should occupy as little memory as possible (both RAM and disk space).
I'm running out of Compact Flash, if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
On Monday 12 December 2005 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
like it even better.
Should depend on as few other packages as possible.
Should occupy as little memory as possible (both RAM and disk space).
I'm running out
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the tip. It's actually pretty fancy for something called
light.
I found another quite trivial one called mini-httpd which i got running
very quickly on my non-embedded system. Next step is to move it to the
embedded system.
Thanks
Michael
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Chris White
6 matches
Mail list logo
