On Tuesday 04 January 2011 21:51:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Do you have
rc_parallel=YES
in /etc/rc.conf?
Nope. These are the only values set in that file; everything else is
comment:
rc_interactive=YES
rc_shell=/sbin/sulogin
rc_hotplug=!*
rc_logger=YES
rc_start_wait=100
unicode=YES
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 12:43:43 Peter Humphrey wrote:
These are the only values set in [/etc/rc.conf]; everything else is
comment:
rc_interactive=YES
rc_shell=/sbin/sulogin
rc_hotplug=!*
rc_logger=YES
rc_start_wait=100
unicode=YES
rc_tty_number=12
[...]
Hmm. I'm wondering about
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:44 on Wednesday 05 January 2011, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 12:43:43 Peter Humphrey wrote:
These are the only values set in [/etc/rc.conf]; everything else is
comment:
rc_interactive=YES
rc_shell=/sbin/sulogin
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 15:32:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Now we need to figure out *why* it was causing your problems
I could just hand it over to the devs via a bug report, but I ought to
do some detective work first, if only to decide which subsystem to log it
against.
The trouble with
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:54 on Wednesday 05 January 2011, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 15:32:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Now we need to figure out *why* it was causing your problems
I could just hand it over to the devs via a bug report, but I ought
On Monday 03 January 2011 14:40:41 walt wrote:
I'm wondering if you have some mixture of baselayout versions on that
machine from previous updates.
Unlikely: this box has been ~amd64 since before it had a complete
system.
Could your machine be trying to start something other than kdm by
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:50 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Monday 03 January 2011 14:40:41 walt wrote:
I'm wondering if you have some mixture of baselayout versions on that
machine from previous updates.
Unlikely: this box has been ~amd64 since
On Sunday 02 January 2011 15:51:24 walt wrote:
On 01/02/2011 03:51 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
It looks as though the boot sequence is going wrong somehow,
because when I get my initial blank screen, if I then switch to a
VT and restart xdm, everything works as expected.
Just for
On Friday 31 December 2010 21:00:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 31 December 2010,
walt did opine thusly:
So, if you've ever run the NVIDIA install program manually, you
probably have two different nvidia.ko files in /lib/modules, and
the wrong one
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:36 on Saturday 01 January 2011, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Friday 31 December 2010 21:00:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 31 December 2010,
walt did opine thusly:
So, if you've ever run the NVIDIA
On Saturday 01 January 2011 20:26:11 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:36 on Saturday 01 January 2011,
Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
Something is messing about with the nVidia module.
That's how module-rebuild works, it's not broken. It *will* rebuild
everything.
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:54 on Friday 31 December 2010, walt did
opine thusly:
On 12/31/2010 04:52 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
This is weird. When I start the system, instead of the kdm login screen
I get a blinking cursor in the top-right of a blank screen. An emerge of
12 matches
Mail list logo
