On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
If you use thin provisioning, you already know i
On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
Google for "thin-provisioning+in+lvm2", first th
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
>> Follow these steps:
>>
>> 0. undo whatever you did
>
> Already did...
>
>> 1. emerge --sync
>>
>> 2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64 >>
>> /etc/portage/package.keywords
>>
>> 3. upda
On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Follow these steps:
0. undo whatever you did
Already did...
1. emerge --sync
2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64 >>
/etc/portage/package.keywords
3. update your system
Or, I could just echo sys-fs/lvm2 -thin /etc/port
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Ok, so... is there or is there not a way to prevent ruby from being
> installed?
Yes
> I've tried adding -ruby and -test to package.mask for
> thin-provisioning-tools, and even tried adding them to USE= in make.conf, to
> no avail...
Follow t
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2013/11/15 Adam Carter mailto:adamcart...@gmail.com>>
>
> Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by
an update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
>
It looks like ruby is only required for the tests o
Chris Stankevitz schrieb am 15.11.2013 16:29:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
>>> update to this version and don't use FEATURES="test" it should not pull
>>> in ruby anymore.
>>
>> I don't have FEATURE
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
>> update to this version and don't use FEATURES="test" it should not pull
>> in ruby anymore.
>
> I don't have FEATURES="test" and it still wants to pull all the ruby crap
2013/11/15 Tanstaafl
> On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>
>> The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
>> update to this version and don't use FEATURES="test" it should not pull
>> in ruby anymore.
>>
>
> I don't have FEATURES="test" and it still want
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES="test" it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have FEATURES="test" and it still wants to pull all the ruby
crap in...
I
2013/11/15 Adam Carter
>
> Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by an
update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
>
It looks like ruby is only required for the tests of
sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools [1].
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
> to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
> is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his system.
Not knowing what g
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz <
chrisstankev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
> to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
> is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on h
13 matches
Mail list logo
