Re: [EXTERNAL] [geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening for the Southern Ocean

2022-03-03 Thread Jonathan Marshall
Australia is also well placed to build upon its existing. and long term. support for more fossil fuels, and a technology neutral position which always means encouraging more fossil fuels and the release of massive amounts of GHG jon ___ From:

[geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening for the Southern Ocean

2022-03-03 Thread robert
As Daniel mentioned, Australia is well placed to build upon its existing support for marine cloud brightening for the Great Barrier Reef. Australia could seek international agreement to test MCB in international waters, working with

[geo] Volcanoes and Climate: Sizing up the Impact of the Recent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption from a Historical Perspective

2022-03-03 Thread Geoeng Info
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00376-022-2034-1?s=08 Volcanoes and Climate: Sizing up the Impact of the Recent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption from a Historical Perspective Meng Zuo, Tianjun Zhou, Wenmin Man, Xiaolong Chen, Jian Liu, Fei Liu & Chaochao Gao Abstract An

[geo] Marine Cloud Brightening for the Southern Ocean

2022-03-03 Thread 'Robert Tulip' via geoengineering
Dear Ye, Peter, Ron, Stephen and all I would like to ask the Australian Government to investigate methods to increase planetary albedo. This is something the G20 should have on its agenda. My view is that cooling the Southern Ocean using Marine Cloud Brightening should be a first topic

[geo] Status of global activities on solar radiation modification and its governance

2022-03-03 Thread Geoeng Info
https://www.c2g2.net/wp-content/uploads/20220210-C2G-Global-SRM-Activity-Update.pdf?utm_content=199869779 *Status of global activities on solar radiation modification and its governance* *Briefing note prepared by the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G) summarising some key insights

RE: [geo] Re: Is Inadvertent "Reverse Geoengineering" since 2020 significantly warming the planet ?

2022-03-03 Thread SALTER Stephen
Hi All The present environmental regulations for geoengineering (not totally ratified) were framed at a time when we were dumping nuclear waste, unexploded munitions and even poison gas into the sea. They essentially meant ‘no new chemicals’. Marine cloud brightening uses material that is

[geo] Re: Is Inadvertent "Reverse Geoengineering" since 2020 significantly warming the planet ?

2022-03-03 Thread Peter Fiekowsky
Anton- Ye has been saying that there isn't peer reviewed literature confirming that CDR at scale is practical, and that he believes the peer reviewed literature. He has provided compelling evidence to back up those two assertions. He is entitled to believe whatever he wants, as are you and

Re: [geo] Re: Is Inadvertent "Reverse Geoengineering" since 2020 significantly warming the planet ?

2022-03-03 Thread Michael MacCracken
Just to note that way back in 2010 when we organized the Asilomar Conference on geoengineering, the State of Victoria in Australia was a co-sponsor of the meeting. And just to note that it is really not clear that use of MCB to address some of the impacts affecting Australia (Great Barrier

[geo] Re: Is Inadvertent "Reverse Geoengineering" since 2020 significantly warming the planet ?

2022-03-03 Thread Peter Fiekowsky
Robert- SRM is a logical top priority. Who will pay for it? How will those doing it avoid assassination? (Moral or physical) Peter Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2022, at 6:50 PM, Robbie Tulip wrote: > >  > Peter > To answer your question, carbon capture can collect CO2 to transform it

[geo] Re: Is Inadvertent "Reverse Geoengineering" since 2020 significantly warming the planet ?

2022-03-03 Thread Peter Fiekowsky
Now we’re acting! Who would we propose it to? Said another way-Who would we invite to do that, whom we would support? Peter Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2022, at 9:03 PM, Robbie Tulip wrote: > >  > The Australian government could be invited to investigate international > agreement for