The appropriate rejoinder is often Compared to what?
For example, What if the application is not spatially uniform? Uneven
application results in uneven cooling, therefore pressure differences,
therefore new winds are generated. Assuming spatially homogenous effects
glosses over all that
Dr Calvin:
Not sure if your response below was to my proposed false (repeat false)
meme, directed to Ken, which read (see more below):
SRM can be analyzed adequately and correctly without comparing to
CDR/NET.
See next in response to your rejoinder: Compared to what?
On Aug
Folks,
I am supposed to give a keynote talk at CEC14 in two weeks. For this talk,
I would like to try to develop a list of oft-cited memes that many assume
are established facts, but which may not in fact be true.
I am thinking of things like: With solar geoengineering, there will be
winners
Here's my slightly cynical and highly personal list of myths
You need to restore baseline temperature not rainfall
Astronomy will be damaged
All skies will always be white
Chemtrails exist
Papers about governance result in better governance
Rainout is dangerous
CDR is commercially viable
CDR
Ken cc list
This is to support your request for ideas for a #2 list (though I
wonder what is on the #1 list). I recognize that you asked for only in the
SRM category, but Andrew added two (his 7th and 8th) on CDR (which probably
sound to a few CDR-folk as not so myth like) so I
