RE: [geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria

2013-06-03 Thread Doug MacMartin
om] On Behalf Of Stephen Salter Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 11:06 AM To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria Dear Alan I was pleased to hear that you will be looking at marine cloud brightening and look forward to

[geo] RE: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria

2013-06-03 Thread John Latham
Hello Olaf, I should have mentioned that, re hurricanes & coral, our idea is to maintain the SST's in the appropriate areas at current values, using MCB to counter CO2 increase. Trying to reduce SSTs below current values is a different and possibly dangerous game, which we are not considering.

RE: [geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria

2013-06-03 Thread John Latham
2013 17:09 To: John Latham Cc: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Subject: [geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria Dear John, We are designing an MCB GeoMIP experiment so we can see how robust the results are from the climate models that have already done these experim

[geo] Re: Marine Cloud Brightening pros & cons. Alan Robock criteria

2013-06-03 Thread Alan Robock
Dear John, We are designing an MCB GeoMIP experiment so we can see how robust the results are from the climate models that have already done these experiments, but all differently. In theory, there would be both benefits and risks, and these must be quantified. From my list, you can cross o