Re: [geo] Re: X ray cloud seeding?

2012-12-19 Thread Jim Lee
Mick why don't you list your http://metabunk.org/ website in your signature? I believe it is completely plausible this method would work. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't rain CCN + static + water molecules? On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 6:13:33 PM UTC-5, Mick West wrote: > > These ionizatio

[geo] Re: X ray cloud seeding?

2012-12-17 Thread Dutch sinse
*http://www.google.com/patents/US4553256* Above link references plasma generation , using X-rays. Producing ionization and heating. So, in theory, it has been most certainly explored as a workable option. Other cases have shown plasma / ionization / electron cascade to induce CCN *formatio

Re: [geo] Re: X ray cloud seeding?

2012-12-11 Thread Mick West
These ionization cloud seeding companies seem to me to be little more than a blend of "free-energy" style investor scams, and the old "rain-making or your money back" scams that have run for hundreds of years. There's no real science behind them, and the operations seem shady at best. They simply c

[geo] Re: X ray cloud seeding?

2012-12-11 Thread Jim Lee
What are your thoughts on the work of Ionogenics, ATLANT, WeatherTec, and Aquiess? http://rezn8d.com/wxmod/cloud-ionization.html On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:37:26 PM UTC-5, JohnLatham wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > The conditions inside a Wilson cloud chamber are very different from > in th

[geo] RE: X ray cloud seeding?

2012-12-07 Thread John Latham
Hello Andrew, The conditions inside a Wilson cloud chamber are very different from in the atmosphere.The supersaturations are immense, because all natural CCN have been removed.Only then can Xrays initiate droplets. These conditions dont exist in nature. What is most needed for natural cloud fo