...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Sent:* Thursday, April 17, 2014 7:22 AM
*Subject:* Re: [geo] WG III (mitigation) report
Greg, I have not read much about sea based CDR -- the first concern that
comes to mind is one of scale. How much of the ocean needs to be affected
to achieve CO2
).
Greg
From: Fred Zimmerman geoengin...@gmail.com
To: Greg Rau gh...@sbcglobal.net; geoengineering
geoengi...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] WG III (mitigation) report
Greg, I have not read much about sea based CDR -- the first concern
Greg, cc list
1. Where and how did you find the URL for the technical summary? I
have looked all over and still can’t find it listed anywhere. Thanks for
finding it.
2. I totally agree that the word “ocean” is inappropriately absent
from the WG3 technical summary - and
The TS is here:
http://report.mitigation2014.org/drafts/final-draft-postplenary/ipcc_wg3_ar5_final-draft_postplenary_technical-summary.pdf
Rest of report at same site.
On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Ronal W. Larson rongretlar...@comcast.net
wrote:
Greg, cc list
1. Where and how
Final report here:
http://mitigation2014.org/report/final-draft/
Technical (not policymaker) summary here:
http://report.mitigation2014.org/drafts/final-draft-postplenary/ipcc_wg3_ar5_final-draft_postplenary_technical-summary.pdf
In this summary I note that the terms ocean and marine appear a
