Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wasted four hours tracking down yet another problem which
> resulted from the one time testing setup running into an issue with the
> singleton we all love: GeoServerDataDirectory. The issue is once again
> that the singleton holds onto state w
Hi all,
I just wasted four hours tracking down yet another problem which
resulted from the one time testing setup running into an issue with the
singleton we all love: GeoServerDataDirectory. The issue is once again
that the singleton holds onto state which is not properly reinintalized
when t
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> It is a stated goal of the Spatial Information Services Stack (SISS)
> project that GeoServer community-schemas be ported to trunk. SISS is
> an NCRIS project http://www.ncris.dest.gov.au/ that will commence in
> July. It is anticipated that the port be completed this
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Chris Holmes wrote:
>> Is all the community schema work still taking place on a forked module
>> on 1.6.x?
[snip]
>> Is there a plan to get on trunk? Or maybe I missed it and
>> it's already there?
>
> There is a stated goal. I am not sure if it has been published. T
The plan I plan to plan (with the paymaster's consent) is:
1. Achieve basic WFS 1.1, GML 3.1 capabilities required, implementing test
cases.
2. Deploy to time-sensitive testbed activity
3. Port to trunk, and debug against test cases and WMS capability
4. Hopefully update deployments to include
Chris Holmes wrote:
> Is all the community schema work still taking place on a forked module
> on 1.6.x?
Yes.
> It seems like a bunch of effort is being put into it there,
> which will then all have to be ported?
That is correct. And it sucks. We have hard deadlines that require
delivery now
Hi Nicolas,
This sounds GREAT!! Contributions are always welcome. So yes, I suggest
we get you a community module. To do that you need:
1. a +1 from one PSC member, which you already have
2. version control access to the community space
To get version control all you need is to sign up for code
Hi everyone. I've published on the NASA WorldWind Community forum (
http://forum.worldwindcentral.com/showthread.php?p=61605 ) a plugin
for geoserver that allows it to serve DDS images. NASA WorldWind .net
and Java 3D globes works internally with this format because it's a
format that a 3D graphic
Mike Pumphrey ha scritto:
> Should we be handling version numbers on branches differently? I too
> have gotten confused by this on a few occasions? Is there a Best
> Practice for this sort of thing?
No, it's just that some would have to go into the i18n files
after each release and change the
I was thinking I would put both as authors for 1., yourself for the
author of 2, and myself as the author of 3. But we can easily change
that later based on who will actually be attending the conference.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Have we decided what to submit. I thin
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Petkov ha scritto:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I downloaded the 1.6.x branch, which after compiling it shows
>> 1.6.1-beta version.
>>
>> Is this branch aligned with the 1.6.3 release and showing an earlier
>> version, o
Alexander Petkov ha scritto:
> Greetings,
>
> I downloaded the 1.6.x branch, which after compiling it shows
> 1.6.1-beta version.
>
> Is this branch aligned with the 1.6.3 release and showing an earlier
> version, or does one need to download 1.6.3 source from somewhere
> else?
We just never cha
Greetings,
I downloaded the 1.6.x branch, which after compiling it shows
1.6.1-beta version.
Is this branch aligned with the 1.6.3 release and showing an earlier
version, or does one need to download 1.6.3 source from somewhere
else?
Thanks in advance,
Alex
-
FeatureType cannot be created for postGIS table with single point
-
Key: GEOS-1941
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1941
Project: GeoServer
Issue Type: Bug
Co
Is all the community schema work still taking place on a forked module
on 1.6.x? It seems like a bunch of effort is being put into it there,
which will then all have to be ported? What readiness on trunk is being
waited for? It has the new feature model on it, and we've done an alpha
release
Oops, last email was CCed to Openlayers, should have been CCed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (a performance testing project being used for
WFS testing)
Cameron Shorter wrote:
> As part of our robustness testing of AWDIP deployments of Geoserver
> (which includes Community Schemas), we have signed up to d
Rob Atkinson wrote:
> 3) The database seems to be hit twice per query, which may be a
> significant overhead if the db side is slow
That was one thing I discovered when profiling the AWDIP Geoserver
yesterday. I talked with Andrea about that and he explained to me that
this is necessary to get
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Have we decided what to submit. I think the following are on the table:
>
> 1. Performance Benchmarking of Open Source Web Map Servers
>
> 2. GeoServer Past, Present and Future
>
> 3. GeoServer and the GeoWeb
>
> If nobody has any objections I can go ahead and su
18 matches
Mail list logo
