[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4309) Add support for DirectConnect + MultipleGeodatabase in ArcSDE datastore

Add support for DirectConnect + MultipleGeodatabase in ArcSDE datastore --- Key: GEOS-4309 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4309 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: New

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1-trunk #159

See -- [...truncated 3891 lines...] Assertion: Deletes a feature by typename and gml:name. Test wfs:delete-feature Passed

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.0-trunk #152

See -- [...truncated 980 lines...] CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE CREATE TABLE UPDATE 68 UPDATE

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1 #271

See -- [...truncated 3867 lines...] Assertion: Deletes a feature by typename and gml:name. Test wfs:delete-feature Passed

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-trunk-online #368

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the i

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Geoserver WFS and PostGis 3D

Hi, Minor steps have been made so far. Only two days of initial effort has been put in so don't expect much :) Changes made: Geotools - Modification in gt-jdbc-postgis to be able to get postgis data: use ST_AsEWKB instead of ST_AsBinary because ST_AsBinary ony returns X,Y removed force_2d f

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4308) support parametrization of KML lookAt properties

support parametrization of KML lookAt properties Key: GEOS-4308 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4308 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: New Feature Components: WMS Affects

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Geoserver WFS and PostGis 3D

Thats very good news indeed. The app-schema support provides some support for 1D objects, I'm not sure that 3-D has been yet tested - and certainly 3D geometry operations wont be. can you provide some more details of what changes you made, to which components, to deliver what capability - there w

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-trunk #3472

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4307) STYLES parameter is not set on GetFeatureInfo request for cascading layers

STYLES parameter is not set on GetFeatureInfo request for cascading layers -- Key: GEOS-4307 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4307 Project: GeoServer Issue Type

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-2.1.x-deploy #4

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the imp

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4306) Image Mosaic dies in fast path with npe

Image Mosaic dies in fast path with npe --- Key: GEOS-4306 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4306 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: WMS Affects Versions: 2.1-RC1

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-2.1.x-deploy #3

See -- Started by upstream project "geoserver-2.1.x" build number 4 [geoserver-2.1.x] $ mvn -U -Djava.awt.headless=true -DskipTests -P allExtensions,proxy,printing,ftp deploy [INFO] Scanning f

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #3471

See Changes: [jdeolive] fixing community release profile, removing wps (moved to extension) and disabling python -- [...truncated 9666 lines...] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Catalan corrections

Hi Oscar, On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Oscar Fonts wrote: > Hey, > > Could you please apply the last catalan corrigendum (GEOS-4274) to > 2.1 branch as well? > Done. > > BTW: Catalan translation financed by Geodata Sistemas, www.geodata.es Good to know. I will update the blog post for 2

[Geoserver-devel] Catalan corrections

Hey, Could you please apply the last catalan corrigendum (GEOS-4274) to 2.1 branch as well? BTW: Catalan translation financed by Geodata Sistemas, www.geodata.es Thank you! Oscar. -- Protect Your Site and Customers fr

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-trunk-nightly #580

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threat

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-nightly #579

See -- [...truncated 1460 lines...] [INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}] [INFO] Compiling 13 source files to

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-2.1.x #3

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the imp

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-nightly #578

See Changes: [groldan] use gwc BoundingBox coord accessors. Internal state is encapsulated now [jdeolive] updated cite tools docs [jdeolive] updated proxy property files, adding missing description properties -

[Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.1-RC1 Released

The GeoServer team is happy to announce the first release candidate of 2.1. Now available for download: http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+2.1-RC1 Check out the blog for what's new in this release: http://blog.geoserver.org/2011/01/18/geoserver-21rc1-released/ The entire change log

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-online #367

See -- [...truncated 9710 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140) at org.apache.maven.sur

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x and trunk builds down

sky is clear now again. Cheers, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:37 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > sigh, sorry about that. Working on it. > I've changed a GWC class member from public to private (encapsulated it) > and didn't realize I'd need to use the new accessors in geoserver too, > then ran o

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-trunk #3470

See -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x and trunk builds down

sigh, sorry about that. Working on it. I've changed a GWC class member from public to private (encapsulated it) and didn't realize I'd need to use the new accessors in geoserver too, then ran out to party for my birthday. back from that I'll fix it right away. Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 08:10

[Geoserver-devel] Geoserver WFS and PostGis 3D

Hi All, In the past there have been several discussions about 3D support in geotools, jts and geoserver. Up untill know there has been done some work (plans) on this but it's still nailed down to 2D in most of the software components. Because of that we (CycloMedia) have been using Deegree 2.4 WFS

[Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x and trunk builds down

Hi Gabriel, Currently the 2.1.x and trunk builds are down due to some gwc complication errors. Are we pulling in the wrong gwc version? -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. --

Re: [Geoserver-devel] blog post for 2.1-RC1

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Cool. Here is is: > http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=837&preview=true > Let me know if that is ok. Works for me :-) Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Ital

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x branch created

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > As discussed the 2.1.x has been created, at revision 15262. > Pom versions on trunk have been updated to 2.2-SNAPSHOT. Onto updating other > version numbers and adding a job in hudson. Cool thanks! Cheers Andrea -- Ing. And

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Little pet peeve: hiding tools/demo pages if there is nothing inside

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Seems fine to me; there is however the danger of someone looking for the > "Demos" page; as such it may be easier to have an empty page; and fill it in > with some text indicating "no demos are currently installer". In the case of > tools