[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-7023) No FID expression found for type

Title: Message Title Bruce Simons created an issue

[Geoserver-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 2.7-cite-wms-1.3 #84

See -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metric

[Geoserver-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 2.7-cite-wfs-1.0 #84

See -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metric

[Geoserver-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 2.7-cite-wms-1.1 #85

See -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metric

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: GeoServer-Master #1699

See Changes: [maurobartolomeoli] GEOS-7022: fixes WMS GetMap interpolations behavior for layer groups -- [...truncated 22182 lines...] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Add a WMS GetMap timeout option

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > As you said, if we accumulate too many of these large requests waiting to > stop in the background, it will kill the server, > and make control-flow useless (as it will think those requests are still > running). > Typo there, I meant, it will

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Add a WMS GetMap timeout option

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > I have moved my prototype implementation of a timeout format option into > GeoServer as part of the RenderedImageMapOutputFormat. (Pull Request here: > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1055 ). > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] by layer interpolation

Hi, I prepared a pull request that should fix layer groups behaviour: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1057 Mauro 2015-05-14 8:15 GMT+02:00 Andrea Aime : > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> When a layer group is used these two lists no longer line up (as th

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-7022) WMS GetMap interpolations issue with layer groups

Title: Message Title Mauro Bartolomeoli created an issue

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Add a WMS GetMap timeout option

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Well I like the creativity behind > "EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.gs.wms_partial" (vs > "EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_blank"). > > I am tempted to call it vnd.gs.se_partial so it is clear it is still a > service exception. What is the HTT

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Adding a new "generic" built-in style

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > May be able to make use of SemanticTypeIdentifier (and “generic:line”, > “generic:polygon”, “generic:point”, “generic:text”, “generic:raster”). > I don't think SemanticTypeIdentifier is meant to be used that way. Going from the javadocs of

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Adding a new "generic" built-in style

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli < maurobartolome...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > This is only for vector data, right? > Thankfully we don't have mixed vector/raster data sources yet :-) Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Adding a new "generic" built-in style

+1 This is only for vector data, right? Mauro 2015-05-13 11:35 GMT+02:00 Andrea Aime : > Hi folks, > as you know, in GeoServer we have four built-in styles, "point", "line", > "polygon", "raster", > that GeoServer automatically associates to layers based on their geometry > type. > > I was co

Re: [Geoserver-devel] By request interpolation method in WMS

Hi Jody, backports are already there, for both GeoTools and GeoServer (2.6.x and 2.7.x). Mauro 2015-05-13 0:38 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett : > Just wanted to double back to this issue, as GEOT-5064 > indicates you want to > back port the functionali

Re: [Geoserver-devel] by layer interpolation

I will have a look at the layergroup behaviour for the interpolations parameter (not sure, I didn't test this scenario explicitly). I guess we have "special" behaviour for the styles parameter to make layers and styles list align, so I will see if we are consistent with that behaviour on the new pa