I know this is chiming in late but I can say that the whole concept of a
workspace was introduced so that we could de-couple it from the idea of a
WFS namespace, having the former be a layer grouping concept and the latter
being just an attribute of a layer, meaning no problem to share them
amongst
I am concerned that if we do let multiple workspaces have the same
namespace we will break the default DescribeFeatureType behaviour which
assumes it can reply on namespace to keep name collisions out of the
generated GML. If this is not the case we may need to check for conflict
and modify the na
I would like to thank IAG as our newest gold code-sprint sponsor:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Java_2017_Code_Sprint
Thanks to the generosity of all our sponsors!
--
Jody Garnett
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on o
Title: Message Title
Mr. McNuggies created
In my initial go at swagger I may of been distracted by how nice it was to
describe the end points and parameters; and ignored sheer amount of work
required to document our XML output. It is basically reproducing an
XMLSchema worth of information for the different end points. Helpful for
JSON, but
Hi Devon,
commit done
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/a9573b74f9c6840131f2d4a37b7c24e330d8337c
Cheers,
Alessio.
Best Regards,
Alessio Fabiani.
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Thanks Torben:
Should we schedule a bug stomp during the code freeze? I do not think we
have set a date for this month...
--
Jody Garnett
On 15 February 2017 at 09:19, Torben Barsballe
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> The GeoTools 17-beta / GeoServer 2.11-beta and GeoTools 16.2 / GeoServer
> 2.10.2 r
Hello All,
The GeoTools 17-beta / GeoServer 2.11-beta and GeoTools 16.2 / GeoServer
2.10.2 releases are scheduled for February 18, so please get any fixes you
want included in these releases merged and backported to the appropriate
branch by the end of the week.
We are planning on doing the relea
Title: Message Title
Ian Turton created an
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
| It will be tricky to test that there is no unintended
cross-communication between the isolated workspaces.
Yeah I agree this will b tricky to test.
Kind regards,
Nuno Oliveira
On 02/12/2017 11:06 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Nuno,
>
> I accept that a ful
Hi Devon,
good catch. Yes the "NoBeanDefinitionFound" Exception should be catch there
and maybe on some other places where similar checks are made.
I will prepare a patch asap and update the community module hopefully today.
Thanks,
Alessio.
Best Regards,
Alessio Fabiani.
==
GeoServer Professio
11 matches
Mail list logo
