I would just go against the geotools process api directly. The resulting
code should be easier to understand and maintain.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 10:36, Johannes Weskamm
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
>
> I know that OGC API Processes ist not yet implemented in GeoServer via
> the OGC API
Hi List,
I know that OGC API Processes ist not yet implemented in GeoServer via
the OGC API Extension.
But as WPS and Processes are very similar and guessing that the
Processes implementation will happen at some point in the future and
GeoServer already has lots of useful WPS Processes, wha
Shadab Gada (
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=612cec1c0f8ff40068b65040
) *created* an issue
GeoServer (
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiYjViYmQ2OTFiNmM4NDA0ZTg1Nzc4YTgzYjA3MTBkNTkiLCJwIjoiaiJ9
) / Bug (
https://osgeo-org.atlassia