Re: [Geoserver-devel] Enhancement: WFS Simple Feature Response in new more compact JSON/JSONP format

2022-10-06 Thread Carsten Klein
Hello Jukka and Andrea, Jukka, apparently I misunderstood you. GeoServer's JSON is GeoJSON as its (backwards-) compatible with GeoJSON (the addition of the inofficial "crs" object does not prevent GeoJSON clients form reading the format). The same is true for OGC's JSON-FG. The new Slim form

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Enhancement: WFS Simple Feature Response in new more compact JSON/JSONP format

2022-10-06 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, I suggest to use something/anything else than "GeoJSON" in the name of the community module or as a common name of the format because this JSON variant is not valid GeoJSON https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7946. In my previous mail I used the OGC draft about the "JSON for features and geom

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Enhancement: WFS Simple Feature Response in new more compact JSON/JSONP format

2022-10-06 Thread Carsten Klein
Hi Jukka, you suggest a different name (e. g. "OGC Features and geometries JSON"). What parts of the module/format would you like to be renamed? Module name? Class name? outputFormat name? Name and description of the format/module in README.md? GeoServer actually has a class named GeoJSONGet

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-10697) WCS 2.0 GetCoverage might fail for coverages slightly crossing the dateline

2022-10-06 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Andrea Aime ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3Ae9469ffc-5e16-4c2b-b7b0-b9c46e912f9e ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiY2Y4ZWY0ZjlhMGVhNGIyOGExZDUzZDE1OTg2MGFhNGEiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / Bug ( https

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Enhancement: WFS Simple Feature Response in new more compact JSON/JSONP format

2022-10-06 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, I would consider some other name because this format is not GeoJSON. OGC is using name "OGC Features and geometries JSON" in its own project for enhancing GeoJSON https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/21-045.html. Perhaps your format could be something like "Slim JSON for features". Maybe you could c

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Enhancement: WFS Simple Feature Response in new more compact JSON/JSONP format

2022-10-06 Thread Carsten Klein
Hello Andrea, I've just issued a PR on GitHub. The format and community module has been renamed to "Slim GeoJSON". "Slim" is shorter and likely easier to pronounce than compact (together with GeoJSON). Sorry for struggling and messing around with Git. However, the final version of the PR sho

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-10696) Allow configuration of Output Format types allowed in GetFeature

2022-10-06 Thread Joseph Miller (JIRA)
Joseph Miller ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3A17451aae-c1cc-4dbc-b304-4a8ad1993fc0 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiY2IwODY5MjAyZmNkNDU5MmE0ZDYyOTI3ZDFlYjA0ZWQiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / Improvemen