[Geoserver-devel] making some great progress on mkdocs

As mentioned in a couple of meetings this summer GeoCat has been looking at migrating documentation from reStructuredText to Markdown (specifically Material for MkDocs ). Started in Bolsena the geonetwork transition is done by a script

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

Another idea: Couldn't there be a more extensible way to declare a SPI provided function "SQL encodable" for a certain Store (e.g. PostGIS)? Maybe a tag interface "SqlEncodable" could do that job? No, it does not make sense... a filter may be sql encodable in one database, but not

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

Andrea, There is nothing planned to support this functionality. We are more interested in nudging people to contribute open code to benefit everyone. Unless you're going to write functions that are very specific to your case, and would not be of interest to the larger community? Maybe I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposal [GSIP 220] - Revised Security Policy and CVE handling

+0 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == Online training classes for GeoNode, GeoServer and MapStore from the experts! Visit https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/professional-training/ for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy President GeoSolutions USA

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 12:10 PM Carsten Klein wrote: > Seems like the actual problem is, that my new function's class is not > registered in the PostgreSQL Store's FilterCapabilities. However, I'm > planing a private plugin-based (SPI) solution for this. How could I modify > (extend)

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

Andrea, 2) Actual function encoding seems only required if functions cannot be encoded like "functionName(a1, a2, ..., aN)", that is referred to "custom encoding":

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:05 AM Carsten Klein wrote: > I managed to add a simple function "add", which returns the sum of both > its Double arguments. The add function follows the GeoTools Function > tutorial: it directly implements the Function interface and gets created by > my own

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposal [GSIP 220] - Revised Security Policy and CVE handling

+1, thank you. On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 8:54 AM Alessio Fabiani < alessio.fabi...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > +1 Thanks > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 9:34 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone, >> >> The motion from September 12th is now passed (its ten day extension now >> elapsed). >>

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Proposal [GSIP 220] - Revised Security Policy and CVE handling

+1 Thanks On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 9:34 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks everyone, > > The motion from September 12th is now passed (its ten day extension now > elapsed). > > >- Alessio Fabiani: >- Andrea Aime: +1 >- Ian Turton: +1 >- Jody Garnett: +1 initial motion >- Jukka

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Custom Database-backed Filter Functions

I managed to add a simple function "add", which returns the sum of both its Double arguments. The add function follows the GeoTools Function tutorial: it directly implements the Function interface and gets created by my own FunctionFactory, which is registered via