+1 here too... sorry for having missing this one and for the delay... been
super busy the last weeks!
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 8:22 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Just to confirm the proposal has been accepted and I have availability to
> work on this next week. The release candidate may be delayed,
Just to confirm the proposal has been accepted and I have availability to
work on this next week. The release candidate may be delayed, but it will
be great to have this done!
Thanks to everyone for the votes, financial support, and many encouraging
emails sent.
Jody
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at
+1
Thanks jody fo removing this forward!
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Professional Support for GeoNode, GeoServer and MapStore from the experts!
Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
President
+1
On 2022-01-11 13:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
I double checked what was needed for log4j update, and updated the
proposal to reflect log4 2 ability to load log4 1 configuration files:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167
While I am not sure I have capacity I hope the research
Here's a late +1 from me.
Cheers,
Torben
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:52 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Follow up from today's meeting:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167 quote has been
> updated to start later, which will delay the 2.21-RC release:
>
>- initial: *75% of funds
Follow up from today's meeting:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167 quote has been updated
to start later, which will delay the 2.21-RC release:
- initial: *75% of funds raised to a maximum of €5000 Feb 11, to allow
time to complete upgrade for 2.21-RC*
- updated: *75%
h proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>>
>>
>>
>> *Lähettäjä:* Jody Garnett
>> *Lähetetty:* maanantai 14. helmikuuta 2022 16.28
>> *Vastaanottaja:* GeoServer
>> *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update
>>
>>
&
d to see also a proposal for logback that by the feature table seems to
> be on the same line with log4j, but we do not have such proposal.
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> *Lähettäjä:* Jody Garnett
> *Lähetetty:* maanantai 14. helmikuuta 2022 16.28
> *Vastaanottaja:* GeoServe
14. helmikuuta 2022 16.28
Vastaanottaja: GeoServer
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update
GSIP-167 did not pass.
So this proposal was not approved before the attached quite expired on Feb 11th.
Please advise what you would like to do next.
Jody
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:36 PM Jody
GSIP-167 did not pass.
So this proposal was not approved before the attached quite expired on Feb
11th.
Please advise what you would like to do next.
Jody
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:36 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Financial proposal provided and attached to
>
Thanks for responding Andrea, I set the quote to expire mid month (…
keeping that timeline in mind.)
I found a comparison here http://www.java-logging.com/comparison/
- Log4j had one more level: “FATAL” (would love to see GeoServer use a
`STATUS` logging level, one notch below INFO)
- Not many
+1 from me
Ian
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 18:13, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Based on today's meeting: I would like to propose GSIP-167
>
> I will attach a quote for 5k to the above page; suggest remaining funds go
> to cite code sprint.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 13:42, Jody
Thanks Jody.
I was hoping to see a comparison with logback somewhere but... time is of
the essence and
the 2.21-RC release date is getting close fast.
+1 no the proposal as is
Cheers
Andrea
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:38 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Financial proposal provided and attached to
>
Financial proposal provided and attached to
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 10:12, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Based on today's meeting: I would like to propose GSIP-167
>
> I will attach a quote for 5k to the above page; suggest remaining
Based on today's meeting: I would like to propose GSIP-167
I will attach a quote for 5k to the above page; suggest remaining funds go
to cite code sprint.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 13:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I double checked what was needed for log4j update, and updated the
>
I double checked what was needed for log4j update, and updated the proposal
to reflect log4 2 ability to load log4 1 configuration files:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167
While I am not sure I have capacity I hope the research is useful.
--
Jody Garnett
16 matches
Mail list logo
