As the original author of the W3DS module I confirm: that module was removed
and discontinued.
There is several better approaches for 3D support, and W3Ds never make it as an
OGC standard.
On 08/11/2017 02:14 AM, Brad Hards wrote:
I don't believe W3DS was ever merged. There is no support that
> I don't believe W3DS was ever merged. There is no support that I am aware
> of.
I was wrong. It did exist as a community module for a while (e.g. back in
2.6), but has since been removed.
Brad
--
Check out the vibrant
> How to manage W3DS layers in GeoServer? I stored several layers in PostGIS
> database, published in GeoServer, however, it does not show W3DS format
and
> cannot query.
I don't believe W3DS was ever merged. There is no support that I am aware
of.
What are you actually trying to do? W3DS appears
How to manage W3DS layers in GeoServer? I stored several layers in PostGIS
database, published in GeoServer, however, it does not show W3DS format and
cannot query.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/W3DS-Implementation-up-and-running-tp4665127p5331184.html
Sen
;
Best regards,
Nuno Oliveira
>
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Nuno Miguel Carvalho Oliveira [mailto:nmco51...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 21, 2012 5:06 AM
> *To:* hideaway
> *Cc:* geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] W3DS Im
ew Year~
Kim.
From: Nuno Miguel Carvalho Oliveira [mailto:nmco51...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 5:06 AM
To: hideaway
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] W3DS Implementation up and running
Hi,
2012/12/20 hideaway
Hi,
I found that one of y
Hi,
I found that one of your examples, Terrain 3D + 3D Buildings, is actually
requesting "GetScene" only, while the example for Terrain 3D is requesting
"GetTile".
As far as I understand that GetTile is for terrain and GetScene is for 3D
buildings, right?
Regarding this, I looked at your running
Thanks, Nuno.
I looked at those libraries you mentioned and I felt there seem a lot of
work for me because I am more like 3D visualizer than geographic person...
Is there anyway that I can get your extension, even code-snippets?
Since you already spend a lot of efforts on it, it would be great
Hi,
I am currently working on displaying terrain data for W3DS.
Your website, http://3dwebgis.di.uminho.pt/geoserver3D/web/, is really
helpful and I appreciate that you open it to public.
I am wondering how you can generate the postgis-data for DEM-Tiles.
I have raster data for DTM/DSM and can
Thanks for cleaning up the patch Nuno. I have created a jira issue for this
and attached a version of the patch cleaned up somewhat (mostly cleaning up
the tab vs spaces formatting).
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4129
Let's have discussion continue there.
-Justin
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1
Hi,
I send two new patches which implements what have been discussed in the
previous mails.
Resume:
Type = geography -> 2D, because ST_AsEWKB don't support geographic type.
(http://postgis.refractions.net/documentation/manual-svn/ST_AsEWKB.html)
No hint -> 3D
hints.put(FEATURE_2D, false) -> 3D
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> Hum,
>
>> the original intended behavior for the hint was to return 3D geometries
>> any time the hint was not explicitly
>> set, that's how we got 3d geometries in GML and KML output even if those
>> do not explicitly set any hints,
>>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nuno,
>>
>> No problem about the misformatting, it is a very common thing for people
>> contributing initial patches. The new patch looks much nicer, thanks!
>>
>> So, its look
Hi Justin, Andrea, Nuno,
Regarding the FEATURE_2D hint:
1) The default behavior of any reader should be to return the data as it
is stored. If the data is 3D, 3D data is returned. If the data is 2D, 2D
data is returned, for every kind of data store.
2) The FEATURE_2D hint should be used to cha
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Nuno,
>
> No problem about the misformatting, it is a very common thing for people
> contributing initial patches. The new patch looks much nicer, thanks!
>
> So, its looking good for the most part. Although it looks like 3d is only
>
Hi Nuno,
No problem about the misformatting, it is a very common thing for people
contributing initial patches. The new patch looks much nicer, thanks!
So, its looking good for the most part. Although it looks like 3d is only
respected if the 2d hint is specified to be false. I think it should be
Hi Justin,
I'm really sorry about the patch i haven't seen the formatting trick (sorry
for the waste of time).
I send in annex two patchs one who makes the changes in the existing
classes and another to add the PostGIS 3D tests.
I hope i did it well this time.
Regards,
Nuno Oliveira
2012/5/
Hi Nuno,
The changes make sense, unfortunately the patch still has issues. The patch
contains largely formatting changes. Looks like spaces were converted to
tabs at some point. This unfortunately makes it nearly impossible to figure
out what actually changed in that class. Seems to be mostly
the
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Nuno Miguel Carvalho Oliveira <
nmco51...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Follows in anexe two patchs, one to integrate W3DS as a community module
> in GeoServer and another to GeoTools who permits the acess of 3D data from
> a PostGIS data base. Related to the acess
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your interest. Thank you also for the pointer to the 52
North initiative regarding 3D. There are more initiatives like Triturus,
and many more will come, we hope.
Some years ago (10 years ago...) was hard to believe that GIS
applications could run on the web. Now everybo
Hi all,
dear Jorge, I am pretty impressed from your efforts with the 3d / X3D
stuff. I just wanted to point to the 52North 3D community.
http://52north.org/communities/3d-community/
They just recently started to establish a similar project derived from
an implementation of the "Hochschule Boch
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jorge Gustavo Rocha wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the valuable feedback.
>
> I'm sorry for not send the proper diffs, etc, but we knew that the
> integration process was just about to start, and now we have time to
> carefully integrate the code pro
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the valuable feedback.
I'm sorry for not send the proper diffs, etc, but we knew that the
integration process was just about to start, and now we have time to
carefully integrate the code properly. We will start by creating a
community module.
I didn't knew that the gith
Hi Jorge,
First off I have to say, very very impressive! Very exciting stuff and I
think i can speak for everyone when i say we are very happy to see this
work being contributed.
That said, not having proper diffs for the work will certainly make it hard
to review the work. Based on the revision
Hi Geoservers,
1. We have been working on an implementation of a W3DS server on top of
Geoserver. We used the draft specification 0.4.0. It's only a draft, but
we think that a working open source implementation can improve the draft
and it might became a standard. The major motivation for this
25 matches
Mail list logo
