I have been looking for some statistics on differences in efficiency for
Geoserver in providing map tiles or arbitrary maps. Tile caching is not an
option in one of our projects due to the use of SQL parameter WMS services
(http://www.mindland.com/wp/?p=121).
Any statistics or sources for
If you truly can't do any caching then I'd guess arbitrary maps would
perform slightly better. Less requests to the server for each view
you're looking at.
But you probably could cache tiles in your use case. Could use
parameter filters in GeoWebCache -
On 4/13/12, Charles Galpin cgal...@lhsw.com wrote:
Do you know which is going to perform better? 32bit jdk with native JAI, or
the 64bit jdk without native JAI?
Gut feeling I'd say 32 bit with native jai, hands down, but I never
really measured
Cheers
Andrea
Andrea,
I was trying to load it with a 32bit JDK, not a 64bit one, without luck. I
may try some more tommorow.
It would be interesting to benchmark the speed difference with a modern JVM.
If it is still significantly quicker, I'll ping my Oracle contacts to see if
I can get them to either
