Hi Fernando,
the printing plugin distributed with 2.5 is using a default template that
referred to an online image that is not available anymore after the
GeoServer website migrated to a different platform.
You can try replacing the config.yaml in your data_dir/printing folder with
the one
Hi,
I am not sure but perhaps you could fool Oracle by inserting the point geometry
of the polygon into the SDO_POINT array of SDO_GEOMETRY. Oracle documentation
says that if SDO_ELEM_INFO and SDO_ORDINATES arrays are not both null then
SDO_POINT will be skipped. However, it would be so nice
Thanks for the idea, Ben. I did look at this briefly, but thought I'd
pursue the simpler approach first. Although auto-simplification would be
much nicer if possible, since it would be more general purpose and give a
nicer visual appearance.
I think I've seen or heard that the Oracle
Ciao Danilo,
such an SLD won't work in GeoServer. You can have only a single
RasterSymbolizer.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to create a GeoServer layer against an Oracle table that
has only X and Y numeric columns?
(This seems like it might provide another potential solution to the issue
of reducing Oracle query data size).
W dniu 2015-03-12 o 01:04, Andrea Aime pisze:
Sounds like a bug indeed... please open a ticket and attach a small dataset
and requests, enough to reproduce the problem
Done:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6934
Regards
Maciej
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Paul Jereb paul.je...@blauorange.com
wrote:
Hello everyone!
When using a parametric SQL View and trying to escape the viewparams
values with backslashes as described in
Hi David,
Many thanks - that's some great info - if I may pry though - why is the
spatial search of SOLR not as good as PostGIS (as I don't know SOLR much I
don't know what to expect :) ) - I presume it's along the lines of PG has
better spatial indexes (indicies?)?
If so, that pretty much
Or it might be simpler and neater to have a function
geomFromWKT_SRID(String wkt, int srid)
After a bit of code browsing it looks as thought this might not be
sufficient to get this to work though?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Answering my own
To take another slant on this, I realized that the source of the problem
is that for SQL views the custom SQL is wrapped in parens before the WMS
bbox filter condition is appended to it. This is what's causing the DB to
complain that the geometry column expression doesn't have an index.
Hi,
About crazy talks, what our hardcore Oracle developers do first when
they face problems with efficiency is to start writing some PL/SQL
procedures which they then tune until they are satisfied (of when we say
that we have paid enough). Unfortunately Geoserver can't utilize those
Martin,
I see what you mean, and it would work in your particular case, but it does
not make
sense in general, please review how sql views work, under the notion of a
general
mechanism (as a data source that can be queried), not under the lenses of
your
specific wms generalization use case, and it
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
About crazy talks, what our hardcore Oracle developers do first when
they face problems with efficiency is to start writing some PL/SQL
procedures which they then tune until they are satisfied (of when we say
that
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now who's talking crazy! :)
+0 on using a full templating language. Seems perhaps a bit of overkill
for the immediate need? The macro
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Reinicke ramot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi David,
Many thanks - that's some great info - if I may pry though - why is the
spatial search of SOLR not as good as PostGIS (as I don't know SOLR much I
don't know what to expect :) ) - I presume it's along the
:
http://www.salford.gov.uk/geoserver/wms?request=GetMaplayers=NE:v_point_display_teststyles=width=512height=445srs=EPSG:3857format=application/openlayerstracker=20150312-Testingbbox=-253000,7057000,-207000,7096000
There is a total 237 polygons features all within the initial viewport, if
you zoom
Hi,
About crazy talks, what our hardcore Oracle developers do first when they face
problems with efficiency is to start writing some PL/SQL procedures which they
then tune until they are satisfied (of when we say that we have paid enough).
Unfortunately Geoserver can't utilize those fancy
A goo search for geoserver cluster turns up lots of resources that
describe various ways to implement clustering. Here's a good one:
http://boundlessgeo.com/2013/04/geoserver-in-a-clustered-configuration-part-1/
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
=512height=445srs=EPSG:3857format=application/openlayerstracker=20150312-Testingbbox=-253000,7057000,-207000,7096000
There is a total 237 polygons features all within the initial viewport, if you
zoom out the 4 points that are displayed should disappear, and if you zoom in
more should appear.
Any
Thank you for the reply Martin, I've followed all the tutorials and they all
lead to vertical clustering (same machine with multiple instances) none of
them explains how to achieve horizontal clustering, though geo solutilns
themselves claim horizontal clustering is possible.
--
View this
Now who's talking crazy! :)
+0 on using a full templating language. Seems perhaps a bit of overkill
for the immediate need? The macro language already discussed would
suffice for the immediate need I think?
Whatever the syntax used, it seems like the solution has to:
- allow altering the
No reply? Did i ask a wrong question?
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-Clustering-Issue-tp5190519p5193097.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you for the reply. First of all i think network isn't an issue here,
I've tested my network supports multicast. Vertical clustering works well
and changes are submitted to instances running on same machine bit changes
on other machines aren't broadcasted. It has something to do with the
Hi,
Question is OK but I guess that there are not so many users running Geoservers
in clusters. Problem But I'm unable to send these changes over network to
other machines makes me feel that it could have something to do with general
network and firewall configuration.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
I think the scheme being discussed should support that nicely. It would be
great to support allowing an arbitrary SQL expression to compute the
geometry returned for WMS usage. That could be a custom Oracle function
which performed some kind of special purpose simplification (if not already
Hello, Ramo.
There would be 2 reasons why SOLR is slower than PG
1. SOLR is not built from the ground up for spatial queries - eg. it
stores spatial data as WKT strings (although maybe it transforms them to
something more efficient behind the scenes? - I don't know)
2. The transfer of the
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi wrote:
Hi,
About crazy talks, what our hardcore Oracle developers do first when
they face problems with efficiency is to start writing some PL/SQL
procedures which they then tune until they are
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now who's talking crazy! :)
+0 on using a full templating language. Seems perhaps a bit of overkill
for the immediate need? The macro language already discussed would
suffice for the immediate need I think?
The
Hi,
Good to know, we must make some tests. All that we have in WFS is implemented
before SQL Views were supported or made with the same recipes later. Are here
any users who utilize stored procedures listening and willing to tell about how
it goes?
-Jukka-
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
We're working on tuning a GeoServer implementation over an Oracle SDO
database. We think we are seeing that the network latency of queries is the
hotspot in the performance of GeoServer render requests.
It seems that for
30 matches
Mail list logo
