maw269 wrote
> I can confirm that switching back to JDK 6 has done the trick. Thanks
> Andrea!
Another confirmation here. Changed to JDK6, rendering is ok now. Feels like
a step backwards. Yet we have seen this before in our project. We have
solved that in our code by adding this in our code:
//
I can confirm that switching back to JDK 6 has done the trick. Thanks Andrea!
Cheers,
Matt
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/WMS-SLD-Pixelated-Font-tp4980180p5045298.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:53 PM, maw269 wrote:
> yeah, I'm on 2.3 and this is very frustrating. I'll keep researching. Let
> me
> know if you find anything.
>
Are you using JDK 7 and requesting transparent images? It seems there has
been a regression painting
labels with transparency with that Ja
yeah, I'm on 2.3 and this is very frustrating. I'll keep researching. Let me
know if you find anything.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/WMS-SLD-Pixelated-Font-tp4980180p5044906.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Maw, we still have this problems. This time we are still working on Geoserver
2.2.2.
Christof
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/WMS-SLD-Pixelated-Font-tp4980180p5044469.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Linde, I am having the exact same issue. Did you ever resolve this?
Linde webgis.de> writes:
>
> Hello Andrea,
>
> sorry for responding late: I'm using image/png not image/png8:
>
> ...geoserver/mwkel/wms?LAYERS=mwkel%
3Alandkreis_krf_staedte&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&FORMAT=image%
2Fpng&FORMAT_OPTION
Hello Andrea,
sorry for responding late: I'm using image/png not image/png8:
...geoserver/mwkel/wms?LAYERS=mwkel%3Alandkreis_krf_staedte&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&FORMAT_OPTIONS=antialias%3Aon&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A3857&BBOX=691693.64083468,6382292.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Linde wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> yes, I'm using 2.1.4:
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> Geoserver 2.1.4
> JVM Version Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_07 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
> VM)
> Natives JAI true (Version 1.1.3)
> Natives JAI ImageIO true (Version 1.1)
>
> The FORMAT=image/
Andrea,
yes, I'm using 2.1.4:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Geoserver 2.1.4
JVM Version Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_07 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)
Natives JAI true (Version 1.1.3)
Natives JAI ImageIO true (Version 1.1)
The FORMAT=image/png8 makes no visual difference to FORMAT=image/png
It's only the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Linde wrote:
> Edward,
>
> thanks for the hint. The admin interface raises the count of available
> fonts up to 60 after installing oracle java and i picked the names of
> the fonts from this list. But i have to inspect things this direction:
> All drawn font sam
Edward,
thanks for the hint. The admin interface raises the count of available
fonts up to 60 after installing oracle java and i picked the names of
the fonts from this list. But i have to inspect things this direction:
All drawn font samples in this admin GUI show more or less the same
"sans seri
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] WMS/SLD Pixelated Font
>
> Hello,
>
> i have still the same problems with ugly looking fonts after upgrading to:
>
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> Geoserver 2.1.4
> JVM Version Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_07 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
> VM)
Hello,
i have still the same problems with ugly looking fonts after upgrading to:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Geoserver 2.1.4
JVM Version Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_07 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
VM)
Natives JAI true(Version 1.1.3)
Natives JAI ImageIO true (Version 1.1)
My onl
Andrea, thanks for the feedback. I wondered if it was going to be an
openjdk issue (why I was sure to include it in the description). I'll
switch to the Sun-JVM (ugh, Oracle. I'll never get used to that) and see
if that improves things.
Sorry for the duplicative question, I couldn't find anyth
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:27 PM, J. Jones wrote:
> Hello list,
> I have what is probably a simple configuration failure on my part, but i
> figure the list is a good place to start:
>
> When generating WMS tiles from GEOServer and presenting them via a SLD
> style, the fonts displayed look... bad
Hello list,
I have what is probably a simple configuration failure on my part, but i
figure the list is a good place to start:
When generating WMS tiles from GEOServer and presenting them via a SLD
style, the fonts displayed look... bad. I've attached some links to a side
by side comparison tha
16 matches
Mail list logo
