Debasish Sahu a écrit :
I have uploaded the EPSG ver 6.7 SQL Scripts into MySQL 5.0 .
Can someone please help me out with an code snippet as to how I can
carry out the transformations . Could not find any such material in
the GeoTools website.
You means using it as the EPSG database? I have nev
Hi All, I have uploaded the EPSG ver 6.7 SQL Scripts into MySQL 5.0 .Can someone please help me out with an code snippet as to how I cancarry out the transformations . Could not find any such material in the GeoTools website. Thanks and Warm Regards,Debasish Sahu
-
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_snapshot?log=log20050928003015Lbuild.12
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20050927211602Lbuild.209
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
Matthias Basler a écrit :
.. and by the way. What's the use of J2SE 1.6 while GeoTools is on Java1.4?
Would we still be able to use this new JavaDoc function?
We could compile Geotools with J2SE 1.4, and generate the javadoc with
J2SE 1.6. But this is just an idea.
Martin.
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_2.1.x?log=log20050927202751
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http:
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20050927195851Lbuild.208
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
Jody Garnett wrote:
We just tried running the tests against the refractions server postgis
is broken with the same WKT parsing error.
I suspect that we are missing a dependency needed to run the tests -
Adding in the units dependency fixed this for postgis - Marc if you are
around can you tr
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_2.1.x?log=log20050927181625
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http:
We just tried running the tests against the refractions server postgis
is broken with the same WKT parsing error.
I suspect that we are missing a dependency needed to run the tests -
Jody
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architectu
Jody took a cursory look at the WKText from Oracle's MDSYS.CS_SRS table
Here is what a query results
SQL>select cs_name, wktext from cs_srs where srid = 82465;
CS_NAME
---
WKTEXT
--
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20050927162331Lbuild.207
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
Is there an export of the "postgis_test" database kicking around
somewhere? (formerly on feathers.leeds.ac.uk)
If we can get a copy, refractions will probably host it.
Thanks,
Cory.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture
Jody Garnett wrote:
Chris Holmes wrote:
QuickOracleTest also had errors - all of the no classdef found kind
Er, isn't the only reason to get noclassdeffounderrors if you have
your jars wrong? Like if you're building then you'll get exceptions,
not noclassdef errors?
As I said it was
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20050927155258Lbuild.206
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
Chris Holmes wrote:
QuickOracleTest also had errors - all of the no classdef found kind
Er, isn't the only reason to get noclassdeffounderrors if you have your
jars wrong? Like if you're building then you'll get exceptions, not
noclassdef errors?
As I said it was not making sense to m
> Chris Holmes wrote:
>
> >>You are correct - I will put the change in.
> >>
> >>
> >cool.
> >
> >
> The change worked, but not all of the tests that used to pass do
> anymore. Did you guys break something when working with the SQL encoder?
> OracleDataStoreTest:
> testBBoxFilter - expecte
Chris Holmes wrote:
You are correct - I will put the change in.
cool.
The change worked, but not all of the tests that used to pass do
anymore. Did you guys break something when working with the SQL encoder?
OracleDataStoreTest:
testBBoxFilter - expected 5 but was 6
testPointGeometry
Chris Holmes wrote:
On a related note I may have to ask you to release 2.1.1, depending on
when geoserver 1.3.0 actually goes out. Dave is apparently tagging
GeoTools for the next GeoServer RC - I had hoped to release a GeoTools
RC at the same time (so there were no surprises for the 2.1.1 rel
James Macgill wrote:
In addition to being wrong, it does not scale down. As for the change of
tag line etc should talk to James.
If you are referring to the 'The open source...' vs 'An open source'
I'm not the guy to talk to.
For years and years it was 'An' but someone (I think it may e
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_2.1.x?log=log20050927145339
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http:
>
> >Jody, looks like this many have been introduced with your new wkt support
> >in oracle? Hans, did this just show up relatively recently, working with
> >the corrected jars for multipolygon stuff?
> >
> doh! One more patch for 2.1.x - my bad. I wonder if we can wrap
> ConnectionPool for te
> In addition to being wrong, it does not scale down. As for the change of
> tag line etc should talk to James.
If you are referring to the 'The open source...' vs 'An open source'
I'm not the guy to talk to.
For years and years it was 'An' but someone (I think it may even have
been you Jody ;)
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
I am all for Java 5 interfaces. They are much more expressive and can
potentially save a lot of time. That being said the trouble is that it
takes time to switch between Java1.4 and Java1.5 interfaces, its not
an automatable process.. The GeoAPI script semi-automates t
Adrian Custer wrote:
If we remove the "N" can we keep the earth in the expected orientation?
Only if you have *no* ambition towards subverting the dominant
paradigm. ;-)
lol
You can, of course, do whatever you please. Removing the N is actually a
good solution, since the N would ind
Sorry I've missed these discussions, was in transit to england (a good 26
hour trip), and then have been busy with conference stuff and attempting
to get my comptuer fixed. I like the ideas here though, I do think we
should move to a more constant api, and I think the suggestion of emailing
th
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20050927134704Lbuild.205
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and
I am all for Java 5 interfaces. They are much more expressive and can
potentially save a lot of time. That being said the trouble is that it
takes time to switch between Java1.4 and Java1.5 interfaces, its not an
automatable process.. The GeoAPI script semi-automates the process, but
you still
Hi Jody,
on the last IRC you mentioned that there's no place in GeoTools for alternative
Java5 interfaces (for better usability).
I just thought this a good idea. So, why not create a place to collect them?
One could then create "altenative" jars that include the Java5 interfaces
instead of the Ja
Adrian Custer wrote:
Hey all,
When I got Map pane working a week ago and it allowed me to *rotate* the
map, I finally transcended a pet peeve which had been irking me since
the days of arcview 2.0. Until this past week, there seemed no point in
having a north arrow in a GIS software package whe
Hey all,
When I got Map pane working a week ago and it allowed me to *rotate* the
map, I finally transcended a pet peeve which had been irking me since
the days of arcview 2.0. Until this past week, there seemed no point in
having a north arrow in a GIS software package when there was no way to
ch
Zitat von Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just my 2 cents: it may help if we stay a little bit conservative in
> method access ("public", "protected", etc.). Begin with private, turn
> into protected or public as needed (it is much easier to turn a private
> method into a public one tha
I'm in about the same boat as Ian ... I just don't update from trunk until I need to commit. I really do like the idea of point 1 ... but this is alot of work too (practicality kicks in). I would be inclined to help / push point one, but only if we points 4 and 5 are also incorporated. I really do
Hi all,
I have corrected several problems on GridCoverageRenderer.
The latter didn't take care of two very important issues:
1) The projection of the grid from the native CRS to the displayCRS (choosen by the User): it was not possible to render coverages other then EPSG:4326
2) The transfor
Matthias Basler a écrit :
5. Facades, two-level API
-
I believe that GeoTools could become a much more user-friendly API if it had a
strict two-level API and developer guidelines that facilitate it.
Just my 2 cents: it may help if we stay a little bit conservative in
me
Hello all,
Thanks to all of you for taking my comments in the positive light that
they were intended for.
In response to Matthias Basler's comments.
1 On integrating docs into the release policy:
I would greatly encourage this and hope to be able to contribute to the
effort. I believe it more
Just to chip in my two cents, as some of you will have noticed I've
been quite on the list and ircs for a while now. There are two reasons
for this one I'm in the process of moving to PennState so I'm quite
busy with things other than coding; the other is a side effect of this,
that I only get to c
Hi developers,
I took from yesterday's IRC that there had been a discussion about the
documentation and user/developer distinction and the question why lots of
projects like uDig do not "use" Geotools as intended (or develop on the
GeoTools codebase) but just take some bits of it and replace the r
GeoTools2 module build report 20050926
gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356
gt2:main cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2359
gt2:shapefile cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2359
gt2:indexed-shapefile cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED
gt2:graph
Debasish Sahu wrote:
Hi All,
There seems to be quite a few Renderer implementation , LiteRenderer,
LiteRenderer2, StreamingRenderer .
StreamingRenderer appears to be the final "name". This is part of the end of
series of LiteRenderer, LiteRenderer2. They are trying to set up a common API
40 matches
Mail list logo
