[Geotools-devel] Caching MathTransforms and CRS objects

2006-08-23 Thread Jesse Eichar
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way that already exists where MathTransforms and CRS objects can be cached. I did some profiling and found that loading MathTransforms and CRSs is very expensive. I was wondering if there is a way that they can be cached so the FactoryFinders and so on w

[Geotools-devel] SLD 1.1 + WMS + uom

2006-08-23 Thread Gabriel Roldán
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:38, Ian Turton wrote: > On 8/23/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... > > 0) ask what is happening with SLD 1.1 (four years and counting) > > Check out discussion papers 05-077 (Symbology Encoding Implementation > Specification) and 05-078 (Styled Layer D

Re: [Geotools-devel] MIF DataStore on Linux

2006-08-23 Thread Luca Sigfrido Percich
Hi Justin, sorry for the late reply, I was on holidays. Thanx so much for this! I've been successfully running tests on both WinXP and Linux Suse10 without problems, so I couldn't understand why the MIFDS didn't pass the tests on your machine. I've applied your suggested patch to the TestCase

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving to geoapi-2.1-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Ian! This is great Richard Gould and I championed some of the ideas going into the Symbology Encoding Implementation Specification (so I suspect the both of us are happy). However a review against this document is *exactly* what is needed Cheers, Jody Ian Turton wrote: >> 0) a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving to geoapi-2.1-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Turton
On 8/23/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well Corey is driving for two reason: > 1) he understands now the maven deploy build lifecycle stuff > 2) he reviewed GeoAPI 2.0 against the SLD 1.0 specification, and has > volunteered to updated the interfaces for GeoAPI 2.1. > > Justin curren

[Geotools-devel] Geoserver Multidimensional WCS

2006-08-23 Thread Adit Santokhee
Hello all,   An page to the GeoServer WCS augmentation has been made. Please review and edit to your liking:   http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/Multidimensional+WCS   Cheers,   Adit   - Using Tomcat

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving to geoapi-2.1-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Well Corey is driving for two reason: 1) he understands now the maven deploy build lifecycle stuff 2) he reviewed GeoAPI 2.0 against the SLD 1.0 specification, and has volunteered to updated the interfaces for GeoAPI 2.1. Justin currently GeoTools is method name compatible for the FeatureTypeSty