Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools Build Failed

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Justin, Any chance you could add the branch this is for in the subject? I'm sure I could memorize which build each buildbot is traking but I'd rather not and the info would be useful in the archives. --adrian On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 18:56 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > View results here ->

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools Build Failed

2006-10-03 Thread Simone Giannecchini
80? :-) Simone. On 10/2/06, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, I can change it. What port would work for you guys? > > > Simone Giannecchini wrote: > > Ciao Justin, > > I should have fixed the build. Anyway, would it be possible to move cc > > to another port because from here I

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0-RC0: Release attempt in progress

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, I'm trying to release the first RC for the 2.3.x branch. My code base checkout was around Tue Oct 3 10:30 UTC 2006. --adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay p

[Geotools-devel] Fixing SVN so commit times are sane

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, SVN is becoming a problem for me: I can't afford to wait an hour every time I need to commit to the repository, especially not if I want to do three commits in succession. I've gathered that the current repository has issues of size possibly due to earlier commits of very large RS images.

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 release and javadocs

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Here's an update at my attempt to release. I'm not sure what got through to the list so I may be a little redundant. The short news is: success. Earlier this week I spent a night trying a test release of 2.3.0, mostly to learn and partly to see where we blocked. The good news is that I

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0-RC0 made but not distributed

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, So I spend the day on this. Everything builds. Javadocs build but exit with error status. The javadocs are therefore incomplete and we can blame our javadocs that are a mess, the maven javadoc plugin which may be broken, and the geoapi.sf site which was down. There are four files at: htt

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fwd: Permission to replace old ArcGrid plugin

2006-10-03 Thread Ian Turton
Not sure why this affects me but +1 Ian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys

[Geotools-devel] geotools Build Failed

2006-10-03 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools?log=log20061003183137 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your

[Geotools-devel] Requested 2.2.1 release on October 12?

2006-10-03 Thread Jody Garnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > the geoserver project would like to enjoy some of the > fixes contained in the 2.2.x branch in order to release > Geoserver 1.4.0rc1 on October16. > Since we need at least a day to perform cite tests against > the release, would it be possible to release gt2 2.2

Re: [Geotools-devel] (GEOT-958) Support FID values greater than int

2006-10-03 Thread Paul Ramsey
FYI, oid is incremented globally across the database any time *anything* happens, so wrapping 2billion is not *that* rare for a database with reasonably activity levels and longevity. Also, since oid is deprecated in the PgSQL 8+ series, I hope it is a third-or-fourth option in the quest for

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.1 release on October 12?

2006-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, the geoserver project would like to enjoy some of the fixes contained in the 2.2.x branch in order to release Geoserver 1.4.0rc1 on October16. Since we need at least a day to perform cite tests against the release, would it be possible to release gt2 2.2.1 on October 12? It's not like we'r

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-961) NullFidFilter returns 1 column with name "null"

2006-10-03 Thread David Adler (JIRA)
NullFidFilter returns 1 column with name "null" --- Key: GEOT-961 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-961 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data jdbc Affects Version

Re: [Geotools-devel] (GEOT-958) Support FID values greater than int

2006-10-03 Thread Cory Horner
Justin Deoliveira wrote: >Reviewed the patch. I could be missing something ( i am pretty >unfamiliar with this class ) but i think the recursive call to >readFidColumn on line 44 of the diff should be: > >readFidColumn( index + 1 ); > >instead of > >readFidColumn( index ); > >So if I am not mistak

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.0-RC0 release being attempted

2006-10-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Adrian Vance Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm trying to release on the 2.3.x branch. That is all. Got an update from Adrian, the files are available here: - http://nature.berkeley.edu/~acuster/files/ Please review, apparently I will make the Jira version counter roll over and start making announc

[Geotools-devel] Fixing geos-715 implies depending on gt2 2.2.x...

2006-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, if we want geos-175 to be fixed, we'll need to upgrade our dependencies to geotools 2.2.1, the bug is really in geotools. See: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-715 Cheers Andrea - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-960) Allow shapefile data store to write down feature types with BigDecimal or BigInteger types (as an extension, every Number subclass)

2006-10-03 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Allow shapefile data store to write down feature types with BigDecimal or BigInteger types (as an extension, every Number subclass) --- Key: GEOT-960

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] testing ml

2006-10-03 Thread Vincent Heurteaux
Ciao, > Well, I've received your mail and no, I don't hate you :-p It's the same for me :-) so far, I've recieved your e-mail only on the geotools-devel mailing list Cheers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0-RC0 release being attempted

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Vance Custer
Hey all, I'm trying to release on the 2.3.x branch. That is all. --adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & bu

[Geotools-devel] Mail is not getting through

2006-10-03 Thread Adrian Vance Custer
hey all, those of us on gmail are not able to contact the list due to mail delivery problems. So communication may get a little strange or thin until sf and gmail work this out. --adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence

Re: [Geotools-devel] Logging adapter commited to trunk

2006-10-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > A way to redirect java logging to Apache's commons logging has been commited > on > trunk as of revision 21736. I did a simple test on my machine and it seem to > work, but I would appreciate a test in a real world environment from someone > using Log4J (for ex

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing ml

2006-10-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > Do you think these mailing lists really really hate me? > > If you answer NO that will make happy, if I do not hear anything I'll > think you hate me too! ;-( Well, I've received your mail and no, I don't hate you :-p Cheers Andrea --

[Geotools-devel] Geoserver configuration woes

2006-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, am I the only one finding the current geoserver configuration inconvenient to work with? I speaking about mvn clean install destroying all the changes you made in the geoserver configuration during testing... now, I know that I can set a data directory, but simply uncompressing, say, citeWMS

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] 2.3.0 Release Un Blocked

2006-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> So I think the current release process (now that we have rescued it from >>> the 2.2.x branch) is fine, and javadocs >>> can wait on volunteer time. >>> >>> >> I more meant more of all the other stuff in our build system that hasn't >> been tested to releas

[Geotools-devel] Steering Document for review by developer list

2006-10-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi, I have tried to put together a steering document for the geotools project (for later review by Paul and Chris). Some of the feedback with respect to OSGeo involvement has been to seek other sources of funding for some of the geotools grunt work (like getting the releases out or improving st

[Geotools-devel] IRC logs october 2

2006-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, is it just me, or the contents at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2006/10/02/IRC+Meeting+-+2+October+2006 are not really yesterdays logs, but the ones from the meeting of a week ago? Compare with this: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2006/09/25/IRC+Meeting+-+25+Septembe