Re: [Geotools-devel] More Reading List Feedback, bug fixing policies with branches

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > 1. Do we make the application of any bug fix / patch to all branches > simultaneously a mandatory practice. > > 2. If the answer to 1 is yes, how do we enforce it? > I think we would do better to sneak up on the problem ... By including the JIRA number in the svn comm

[Geotools-devel] More Reading List Feedback, bug fixing policies with branches

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
More feedback that came up just recently for me. I just spent some time tracking down a bug on trunk that was fixed on the other active branches ( 2.2.x, 2.3.x ) I am wondering if we need to make it policy that bugs get applied to all active branches, and most importantly trunk. And also that fixe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online Tests and profile hacking

2006-11-02 Thread Cory Horner
Justin Deoliveira wrote: >I think it might make more sense to >instead of having an offline profile, To have two profiles online, and >extensive, and keep the current default profile behavious. > >I say this because perhaps I want to make the default profile in my >module something different for w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online Tests and profile hacking

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Cory, Nice work!! However one thing. I think it might make more sense to instead of having an offline profile, To have two profiles online, and extensive, and keep the current default profile behavious. I say this because perhaps I want to make the default profile in my module something differ

[Geotools-devel] Online Tests and profile hacking

2006-11-02 Thread Cory Horner
Howdy, I've just applied a change to the root pom, which sort of brings back the -o option from maven 1. Rather than always excluding *OnlineTest.java from our suite of test cases, this has been moved to a profile which we have the option of enabling/disabling. At the moment, it is the defaul

[Geotools-devel] transition filter -> filter

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
So for trunk everyone has had a version to switch to Filter, so I am changing to match. The old method will still be their and deprecated etc... The JDBCDataStore will still cast to GeoTools filter internally (for the moment). Cheers. Jody --

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE speed and logging patch for gt 2.2.x

2006-11-02 Thread Saul Farber
See previous post for details of patch. Attached is gt-2.2.x compatible patch. --saul Index: plugin/arcsde/datastore/src/org/geotools/filter/SQLEncoderSDE.java === --- plugin/arcsde/datastore/src/org/geotools/filter/SQLEncoderSDE.j

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: ... > > For now I changed the version to the timestamped snapshot (a practice I > think GeoServer release candidates are considering when depending on > GeoTools?) Not unless necessary. For the moment we're depending on 2.2.x, which is pretty stable

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of FeatureId, Id change

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
All done with geoapi changes. FeatureId moved to identity. -Justin Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Done. > > Deployed new geoapi snapshot and committed on geotools trunk. I haven't > moved FeatureId to identity yet, setting up my GeoServer environment > will do shortly. > > -Justin > > Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting Supported "Reading List"

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Jody, Here is the rest of my review: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking+your+own+Module The first part of this doc sounds like guidelines for hacking someone else's module. I think the second section should have the first part be asking permission to create a new module. Just so

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting Supported "Reading List"

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
And about the other pages? > Yup, I reviewed this before. I think this page makes great guidelines > for data store implementors. Hopefully we can get some feedback from > some of the datastore module maintainers as well. > > -Justin > > Jody Garnett wrote: > >> It seems I left out one, the FM b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting Supported "Reading List"

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yup, I reviewed this before. I think this page makes great guidelines for data store implementors. Hopefully we can get some feedback from some of the datastore module maintainers as well. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: > It seems I left out one, the FM branch has clear QA guidelines, not sure > ho

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.11 Build Fixed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061102133228Lbuild.11 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

[Geotools-devel] Getting Supported "Reading List"

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
It seems I left out one, the FM branch has clear QA guidelines, not sure how to roll this into the developers guide: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Feature+Model+Branch I could really use some help here as I would like the instructions to be clear, what is the best way to do this? A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of FeatureId, Id change

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Done. Deployed new geoapi snapshot and committed on geotools trunk. I haven't moved FeatureId to identity yet, setting up my GeoServer environment will do shortly. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Hi Jody, >> >> Looking over things: >> >> 1. It looks like you have FidFil

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061102132548 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

Re: [Geotools-devel] DB2 what is next ...

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin can I trouble you to review the pages in the developers guide describing what is needed? So far nobody has done so - and you have a good insight after being caught on the short end of the stick during the FM Branch. Things I am not sure are covered: - deprecations, I would like to see su

Re: [Geotools-devel] Review of FeatureId, Id change

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi Jody, > > Looking over things: > > 1. It looks like you have FidFilterImpl still implementing the FeatureId > interface, I think it should now implement the Id interface instead. > > 2. FilterVisitor#visit( FeatureId,Object) needs to be changed to > FilterVisitor#visit

Re: [Geotools-devel] DB2 what is next ...

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I am going to talk to our sysadmin about getting a db2 install going on our development server today. I will let you know what he says. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: > David Adler wrote: >> I reviewed the page and it looked reasonable. I fixed the broken link >> for "review.txt" at the top and th

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Jody Garnett wrote: > >> So deployed a new GeoAPI snapshot jar here: >> - >> http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.1-20061102.035834-8.pom >> - >> http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> So deployed a new GeoAPI snapshot jar here: >> - >> http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.1-20061102.035834-8.pom >> >> >> - >> http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics

[Geotools-devel] DB2 what is next ...

2006-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
David Adler wrote: > I reviewed the page and it looked reasonable. I fixed the broken link > for "review.txt" at the top and the link to my profile page although > this doesn't contain much that is interesting. > > What is needed to move the DB2 plug-in from "unsupported" to the > "Plugin" cate

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x build.20 Build Fixed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061102123447Lbuild.20 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-users] GeoServer 1.4.0-RC2 released!

2006-11-02 Thread Chris Tweedie
Couple of things at a quick glance for SDE stuff, 1. Should Commons-pool.jar be bundled with arcsde plugin for future releases? Seems as though this is the only one that requires the library 2. The latest builds of the plugins didnt include arcsde 3. Using the latest available arcsde-plugin + c

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] New Spearfish demo

2006-11-02 Thread jdONeill dev
David: It worked out of the box for me using GT 2.2 and DB2 v8.1.7.445. cheers -- dOp David Adler wrote: > I've updated the Spearfish demo to work with the GeoTools 2.2 and 2.3 > MapPane. > > It supports both the DB2 data store and the Shapefile data store by > changing a parameter. The shap

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-users] Wrong WKT String for CH1903/LV03 Projection (ESPG:21781)

2006-11-02 Thread Thomas Zuberbuehler
The WKT string for CH1903/LV03 21781=PROJCS["CH1903_LV03",GEOGCS["GCS_CH1903",DATUM["D_CH1903",SPHEROID["Bessel_1841",6377397.155,299.1528128]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["Degree",0.017453292519943295]],PROJECTION["Hotine_Oblique_Mercator_Azimuth_Center"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",60],PARAMETER

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer 1.4.0-RC2 released!

2006-11-02 Thread Brent Owens
The GeoServer team is proud to announce the second release candidate of the 1.4 series. You can download the release here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+1.4.0-RC2 This release includes: - New version of imbedded Jetty server - More documentation - GML Datastore extra - German Tr

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x Build Failed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061102122556 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

[Geotools-devel] Review of FeatureId, Id change

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Jody, Looking over things: 1. It looks like you have FidFilterImpl still implementing the FeatureId interface, I think it should now implement the Id interface instead. 2. FilterVisitor#visit( FeatureId,Object) needs to be changed to FilterVisitor#visit( Id, Object ); 3. The methods from geo

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE patch for 2.3.x branch and gt-trunk

2006-11-02 Thread Saul Farber
Gabriel (and other arcsde folks!) I'm attaching a patch that deals with four JIRA issues. The two versions are exactly the same, one just works with trunk paths, the other with 2.3.x paths. Jira issues http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1007 and http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1006

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Jody Garnett wrote: > So deployed a new GeoAPI snapshot jar here: > - > http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.1-20061102.035834-8.pom > - > http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.1-200

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.8 Build Fixed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061102092138Lbuild.8 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrat

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061102091450 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x build.19 Build Fixed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061102085429Lbuild.19 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x Build Failed

2006-11-02 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061102084541 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module Matrix page updated to be less of a pain - DB2

2006-11-02 Thread David Adler
I reviewed the page and it looked reasonable. I fixed the broken link for "review.txt" at the top and the link to my profile page although this doesn't contain much that is interesting. What is needed to move the DB2 plug-in from "unsupported" to the "Plugin" category? Regards, David At 01:2

[Geotools-devel] Dependencies on epsg-wkt set to test scope

2006-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, I've just committed changes to make sure every dependency onto epsg-wkt was set to test scope (well, besides the demos, that is) to ensure no transitive dependency on it would be aquired by other projects using our modules (both compile and runtime scopes are transitive...) We noticed this

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 09:03 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: > > Is there a way to get the latest SNAPSHOT and leave trunk as is? > > It should be automatic as long as you deploy the jar to the server > with mvn install:install-file, more explainations here: > http://maven.apa

Re: [Geotools-devel] oracle/jdbc: createFeatureWriter contract

2006-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > I am currently reviewing the Oracle Datastore, and by extension the > JDBCDataStore. ... > It appears that setting the listenerManager is part of the contract > here; that was not noted in javadocs and thus not followed. A bit of a > code review and it turns out that

Re: [Geotools-devel] update trunk to new snapshot jar ... how?

2006-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > So deployed a new GeoAPI snapshot jar here: > - > http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.1-20061102.035834-8.pom > - > http://lists.refractions.net/m2/org/opengis/geoapi-nogenerics/2.1-SNAPSHOT/geoapi-nogenerics-2.