Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> Well, I see that you never fought with the reversed-axis problem but
> believe me when everybody understands lon,lat while our crs where
> mostly lat,lon these methods come pretty hand to reverse things .-).
I never fought the reversed-axis problem in the sense that
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> First of all an annotation. I am currently working exclusively on
> 2.3.x, I will port all the fixes I am making to trunk not before the
> end f the month. Which version are you working on?
On the trunk. But they are all changes that I would like to port to the 2.3
First of all an annotation. I am currently working exclusively on
2.3.x, I will port all the fixes I am making to trunk not before the
end f the month. Which version are you working on?
On 11/12/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Simone
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Sim
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> I can move them in an utility class then (will try to find which utility
> class
> could be appropriate). But actually the only usage I found right now was in
> RendererUtilities, and it was possible to avoid it by constructing a slightly
> offseted envelope.
I
Hello Simone
Thanks for your feedback.
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> Well, in this is the sentence "by definition" may have a different
> meaning for different people because it is at the same time subjective
> as well as dependent on the data source. Some examples, in GTOPO30 the
> nodata valu
On 11/11/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm very late, but I finally started to review the coverage branch merge. I
> would like to hold on the 2.3 release until I finished this review, since I
> have
> some questions.
>
> org.geotools.coverage.CategoryList
>
