[Geotools-devel] Partial 2.3.0 release

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
From the following page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release I have done the following: - Uploaded the JAR to the maven repository - Uploaded the ZIP files to SourceForge: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=4091&package_id=95639 - Prov

Re: [Geotools-devel] upgrade to geotools 2.4 question for Martin?

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > I am tracking changes needed when upgrading to GeoTools 2.4 on this page: > > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GeoTools+2.4+for+uDig+Developers Thanks for doing that! > - CRSUtilities.getEnveleope( CRS ) ---> CRS.getEnvelope( CRS ) > > Can I confirm t

Re: [Geotools-devel] JAI problems on trunk? was: Can we assume that everybody upgrated to JAI 1.1.3?

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : >> Running org.geotools.coverage.grid.ResampleTest >> # >> # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: >> # >> # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) at pc=0x03900ca6, pid=3960, >> tid=648 >> # >> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_12-b0

[Geotools-devel] upgrade to geotools 2.4 question for Martin?

2006-12-01 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin - I am tracking changes needed when upgrading to GeoTools 2.4 on this page: - http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GeoTools+2.4+for+uDig+Developers So far two changes have your name on it: - CRSUtilities.getEnveleope( CRS ) ---> CRS.getEnvelope( CRS ) Can I confirm this

[Geotools-devel] JAI problems on trunk? was: Can we assume that everybody upgrated to JAI 1.1.3?

2006-12-01 Thread Jody Garnett
I am having consistent problems on trunk with this version of JAI - but only since today (and simone did make changes): > Running org.geotools.coverage.grid.ResampleTest > # > # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: > # > # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) at pc

[Geotools-devel] where is the user guide wiki?

2006-12-01 Thread Jody Garnett
Is the space deleted? This is the only record we have of some of the xml tutorials - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinion

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.134 Build Fixed

2006-12-01 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061201170229Lbuild.134 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chan

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed (libraryJTS/target was committed )

2006-12-01 Thread Justin Deoliveira
My apologies, seems that a target directory got committed by accident. I have remove the directory and set the svn:ignore property on that directory. Build should be back shortly. -Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > View results here -> > http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-tru

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 tagged and ... well, no, not released

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Cory Horner a écrit : >> We are stuck at "Performing the Release" of >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release >> Martin suggests that the rest of the deploy can be done by anyone >> checking out the tag directory above, building it, and then doing >> mvn deploy >> possibly s

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-12-01 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061201161010 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 tagged and ... well, no, not released

2006-12-01 Thread Cory Horner
Adrian Custer wrote: >We are stuck at "Performing the Release" of > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release >Martin suggests that the rest of the deploy can be done by anyone >checking out the tag directory above, building it, and then doing > mvn deploy >possibly skipping th

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 tagged and ... well, no, not released

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adrian Custer a écrit : > Could someone in close proximity to lists.refractions.net try > deploying to it? I'd like to establish whether the problem is > some network distance thing, server use or something like the > webdav system. I tried to deploy on refractions server, and it worked like a cha

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 tagged and ... well, no, not released

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Once again, I fail to release. The directory is tagged and waiting on http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/tags/2.3.0/ some of the files even got uploaded to lists.refractions.net We are stuck at "Performing the Release" of http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release Mart

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureCollection questions

2006-12-01 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Bryce, I will do my best to answer your questions :). Bryce L Nordgren wrote: > FeatureCollection appears to be one of the items being overhauled as > part of the feature model effort. It's a toughie because it's a mix of > GML, the Java Collections Framework, and user needs. I realize you

[Geotools-devel] FeatureCollection questions

2006-12-01 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
FeatureCollection appears to be one of the items being overhauled as part of the feature model effort.  It's a toughie because it's a mix of GML, the Java Collections Framework, and user needs.  I realize you're not done yet, but could I pick your brains about where you're headed?  I'm trying to te

[Geotools-devel] SDE complex-features port to trunk

2006-12-01 Thread Saul Farber
Hey gabriel, I had a chance to go through your SDE datastore code on complex features, and I'm really impressed. Lots of great ideas, and I really like the FIDReader stuff to support a more general approach to fetching FIDs from sde rows. I have a couple of comments, which I'll try to put in

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x build.71 Build Fixed

2006-12-01 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061201134417Lbuild.71 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chanc

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x Build Failed

2006-12-01 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061201120551 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.x branch, plugin epsg-ext-esri is not in the build

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adrian Custer a écrit : > Can anyone confirm that epsg-ext-esri is designed not to be in the > build? Is it intended to become part of the build in the 2.3.x branch? You can ommit it. It is an "unsupported" module because not yet finished. Martin -

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 release: HELP needed

2006-12-01 Thread Cory Horner
Adrian Custer wrote: > Release:prepare is failing at the very start because maven tries to > download gt2-referencing-2.3.0 which has not even been built yet. I'm > not sure where things went wrong. > > The release.properties (attached) also seems on crack with version > numbers all over the place

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 release: HELP needed

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Release:prepare is failing at the very start because maven tries to download gt2-referencing-2.3.0 which has not even been built yet. I'm not sure where things went wrong. The release.properties (attached) also seems on crack with version numbers all over the place. I'm not really sur

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.x branch, plugin epsg-ext-esri is not in the build

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Can anyone confirm that epsg-ext-esri is designed not to be in the build? Is it intended to become part of the build in the 2.3.x branch? --adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceFo

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 test failure (cont. 3)

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Simone, so I was not thinking straight, you're comparing the decoded files not the raw files themselves so the text differences will not be the cause of the problem. However, the newly written file has 8008 lines whereas the original has only 12---not sure yet what's going on there. --adrian

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 test failure (cont. 2)

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Simone, Looking at the files in ghex2, there are several problems: logipod:/tmp> head -6 GiantRowsImage.asc 4781060525GiantRowsImage.asc ==> GiantRowsImage.asc <== ncols 2000 nrows 8000 xllcorner -180 yllcorner -90 cellsize 0.0225 NODATA_value 1.70141E38 ==> 4781060525GiantRowsImag

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 test failure (cont.)

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Simone, The file command on unix does suggest that the line feed problem exists although the file sizes are totally different: ll GiantRowsImage.asc 4781060525GiantRowsImage.asc ... 294M 2006-12-01 13:36 4781060525GiantRowsImage.asc ... 107M 2006-10-12 01:34 GiantRowsImage.asc file GiantRows

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.0 release delayed pending ArcGrid fix; Questions for Simone

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, The ArcGrid module is failing the extensive testing. Seems like a central module. Apparently Simone will be around later so I'm delaying the release until he has a look. --adrian Simone, Several issues for you: 1) The test failure: --- The problem appears to be when r

Re: [Geotools-devel] Is Simone working today?

2006-12-01 Thread Alessio Fabiani
Not in the morning ... maybe afternoon, for sure evening. On 12/1/06, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is all, adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel

[Geotools-devel] Is Simone working today?

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
That is all, adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash htt

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.x: Test failures with extensive testing in ArcGrid read/write

2006-12-01 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Simone, everyone, There's a test failure in the ArcGrid module which seems due to not picking up the right CRS. Any chance you could look at it? --adrian - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join Sourc