It appears as if Java EE has been out for a wee bit (may?) so we
probably should update our Language Policy again.
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2.1+Language
>
> Our policy is waiting for a dot release before migrating to new
> version of the Java language. The GeoTools project will not
So much for writing a client :P. So since there doesn't seem to be a
defacto standard between the other servers I suggest that we make our
implementation as close to the spec as we can. And Jody's suggestion
about a blog isn't a bad one. I don't expect that we can embarrass
mapserver int
Thanks for the introductions Martin, feels like I have a whole new group
of people to meet.
I am doing planning this week; my goal is to review the available
implementations and decide which
one to support (see GeoTools supported module process). In an ideal
world I would love to function
as a
Remember to send such methods to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I will check to
see if they found out already.
Jody
> Hi all,
> it seems geotools svn is down.
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Pst - Andrea. Why not make a GeoServer blog entry out of this - and get
the issue into a wider area of discourse. At least place it on osgeo
discuss email list.
Cheers,
Jody
> Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
>
>> I've been using SLD 1.0 page 26 for the basis of my research. But
>> I'd like to loo
Online report :
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/346
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:00:03 -0500
Finished at: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:00:04 -0500
Total time: 0s
Online report :
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/345
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:00:02 -0500
Finished at: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:00:03 -0500
Total time: 1s
Le mardi 30 janvier 2007 à 10:54 +0100, Andrea Aime a écrit :
> One funny thing is that I'm running Geoserver 1.5.x (which uses gt2
> 2.3.x) on java 1.6 already, and it just works shouldn't it break
> instead?
I believe that only "javac" complies about missing implementation for
abstract meth
Le mardi 30 janvier 2007 à 18:49 +1100, James Macgill a écrit :
> Oh, and watch assumptions abou itteratoin order in non-ordered collections!
That right, I forgot talk about this point. In order to get trunk to
compile with Java 6, I disabled 2 tests (if my memory serve me right)
which was making
Hi all,
it seems geotools svn is down.
Cheers
Andrea
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through b
Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> I've been using SLD 1.0 page 26 for the basis of my research. But
> I'd like to look at map server as well since it is one of the big Web
> Map Servers out there. If their calculation fits into the spec it
> would be nice to align with them as much as possible. I
On 1/30/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Macgill ha scritto:
> >> [22.45] The problem is that those new methods expect an
> >> argument type which is new in Java 6, so we can't implement them and
> >> compile them with Java 4.
> > Erm, I 'implemented' these with Class and Object
Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> I've been using SLD 1.0 page 26 for the basis of my research. But
> I'd like to look at map server as well since it is one of the big Web
> Map Servers out there. If their calculation fits into the spec it
> would be nice to align with them as much as possible. I
Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> I've been using SLD 1.0 page 26 for the basis of my research. But
> I'd like to look at map server as well since it is one of the big Web
> Map Servers out there. If their calculation fits into the spec it
> would be nice to align with them as much as possible. I
StyleBuilder.createRule(Symbolizer, double, double) ignores scale denominators
--
Key: GEOT-1140
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1140
Project: GeoTools
Iss
James Macgill ha scritto:
>> [22.45] The problem is that those new methods expect an
>> argument type which is new in Java 6, so we can't implement them and
>> compile them with Java 4.
> Erm, I 'implemented' these with Class and Object (no genics) and they
> compiled fine. Felt like a bit of a h
16 matches
Mail list logo
