http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/86/buildId/1487
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
Hi guys,
Just a heads up -- I am switching jobs and am no longer at
Refractions. If you have any comments/questions, please respond off-
list to my gmail account.
I will continue to contribute in my volunteer time, but on a more
relaxed pace (time for bug fixes, not new features).
Cheers,
Jody Garnett wrote:
> So this should be a "normal" maven site - ie one we can link to that
> holds the results of the coverage reports?
Yes -- alternatively there is geotools.fr, but i'm not sure what the
update frequency of it is. We cannot get our build box to deploy the
site to martin's due
So this should be a "normal" maven site - ie one we can link to that
holds the results of the coverage reports?
Are we still unable to generate javadocs? Or can we get that as well ...
Going through the link there are a few fun things:
- http://lists.refractions.net/gt/modules/license.html links
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Well, this is going to speak trouble for whoever tries to have both
> gt and gs loaded in the same eclipse... in that you would have two
> "main" modules. Main is such a common name that other projects
> may have the same issue as well.
>
> I think we were waiting for a fix in
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 13:44 -0700, Graham Davis wrote:
> If that's the case, I think many of the module POM files list the
> following for the license info:
>
>
>
> Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
> http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.txt
> repo
>
>
>
> And
If that's the case, I think many of the module POM files list the
following for the license info:
Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.txt
repo
And that URL points to the v3 license, not 2.1.
Graham.
Adrian Custer wrote:
>W
Wait, wait, wait.
I really we suggest we stay "v2 or later", if that's what we were using,
until we hit OSGeo. Then we can switch to the "swiss cheese license" for
all I care but I'd like to not muddy things for now. It should only be
another decade or so before we emerge from incubation...
--adr
Okay. How do I go about getting a consensus from "everyone involved"?
Graham
Chris Holmes wrote:
>Afaik we're at LGPL v2. It's probably one that says version 2 or later,
>which means anyone's allowed to do the upgrade to version 3. But we
>should decide as a project if we want to, get consen
Afaik we're at LGPL v2. It's probably one that says version 2 or later,
which means anyone's allowed to do the upgrade to version 3. But we
should decide as a project if we want to, get consensus from everyone
involved.
As far as I know v3 has no major downside and has a nice upside that helps
u
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Thanks for the reply: if understand everyone correctly the best course
> of action is ...
> - deprecate FeatureList in 2.4.x
> - remove it from 2.5.x (ie trunk) even if it is just so Justin has less
> to cope with
Yeah, that would be the proper way API wise, not sure i
Thanks for the reply: if understand everyone correctly the best course
of action is ...
- deprecate FeatureList in 2.4.x
- remove it from 2.5.x (ie trunk) even if it is just so Justin has less
to cope with
Long term (ie for GeoAPI ) we should seriously consider just removing
it, and if not look
I'm starting work on the IP review for the geometry module (not fun!)
and noticed that the LICENSE.txt file seems to have the LGPL v2.1 text
in it. The POM file for my module however, links to:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.txt which is version 3. Should the
LICENSE.txt files be updated
DataStoreFinder hides exception from DataStoreFactory.createDataStore(...)
--
Key: GEOT-1403
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1403
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type:
We had a question from a programmer on the JPP mailing list. They
wanted to know if we had done any work with raster reporjection.
Someone mentioned that GeoTools might have something in this area.
Do you guys have any code that works on the reprojection of rasters?
Thanks,
The Sunburned Surveyo
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea had a good idea today (well most days). He points out that nobody
> has implemented FeatureList properly yet ... and wonders if we can just
> return a FeatureCollection.
>
> Thinking ...
>
> What do you guys think about making a SortedFeatureCollection -ie jus
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Andrea had a good idea today (well most days). He points out that nobody
> has implemented FeatureList properly yet ... and wonders if we can just
> return a FeatureCollection.
>
> Thinking ...
>
> What do you guys think about making a SortedFeatureCollection -ie just
>
Andrea had a good idea today (well most days). He points out that nobody
has implemented FeatureList properly yet ... and wonders if we can just
return a FeatureCollection.
Thinking ...
What do you guys think about making a SortedFeatureCollection -ie just
the assurance that the iterator is s
It was part of the Filter 1.1 stuff - and I agree it has not been
communicated to my satisfaction either. At the time not a lot of people
were on trunk and I did well to even write down the interface changes.
Bleck,
Jody
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Nope I ment FeatureList - the provided query
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Nope I ment FeatureList - the provided query was supposed to request a
> sort order :-(
Jody,
frankly it's the first time I've heard speaking about FeatureList, and
of the supposed requirement to return an instance of it when sorting
stuff...
Cheers
Andrea
--
Nope I ment FeatureList - the provided query was supposed to request a
sort order :-(
Jody
> Gertjan van Oosten ha scritto:
>> As quoted from Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> I have gathered up the two FeatureList examples provided and place
>>> them onto the following page:
>>> - http://do
Gertjan van Oosten ha scritto:
> As quoted from Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I have gathered up the two FeatureList examples provided and place them
>> onto the following page:
>> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/10+FeatureList
>
> You wrote:
>
> FeatureList featureList = (Fe
As quoted from Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have gathered up the two FeatureList examples provided and place them
> onto the following page:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/10+FeatureList
You wrote:
FeatureList featureList = (FeatureList) source.getFeatures(query);
Can I
23 matches
Mail list logo
