http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=417&projectId=81
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=416&projectId=1
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070m
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=409&projectId=1
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070m
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=401&projectId=81
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070
On 9/19/07, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I know the module is unsupported so I have no right to expect it to
> work but some of my demos from 2.3 no longer draw.
> Has anyone else noticed any changes when upgrading? I am looking for a
> quick fix - or I will just call the stre
Yes I know the module is unsupported so I have no right to expect it to
work but some of my demos from 2.3 no longer draw.
Has anyone else noticed any changes when upgrading? I am looking for a
quick fix - or I will just call the streaming renderer directly.
Jody
--
Morning Stefan, you will see in your inbox that you now have access to
svn; I would ask you got make sure you read the developers guide and ask
a lot of questions. Someone is usually online on the #geotools IRC
channel to answer some questions (but everything should be in the
developers guide).
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=396&projectId=86
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070
These are exciting times, congrats on the hard work guys.
Of course there are still *lots* to do, and that's great, as its an indication
we're moving forward.
Gabriel
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 06:42:57 Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> > You may have seen the massive commit I
Hi Justin,
I ran into compile errors when using Java 6 - they all amounted to
collections vs collections and a bit of inappropriate code reuse.
I had to apply a really horrible double cast into a couple of places in
the jts-wrapper code ... we should ask Graham for a review as he solved
most o
Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
...
>> Ideally we would have a simple "schema editor" on the feature type
>> editor page, similar to what we have now but be able to set things like
>> namespace uri's for attributes, base types, etc... Just a thought, not
>> sure if its a good one :).
> Excellent. Agreed
11 matches
Mail list logo
