Andrea Aime a écrit :
> I don't have any specific issue with upgrading to 2.0.9 provided it
> works ;) (past history shows that maven is full of surprises... as Jody
> wisely said some days ago "when it works... it's magic... and when it
> does not... it's magic too! :) ").
Yes, sometime I wonde
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Would it be acceptable to update the requirements to Maven 2.0.9? The reason
> is
> that I would like to drop the section in the root pom.xml
> in
> favor of default plugin versions bundled in Maven since 2.0.9. The reason for
> that is that we do not upgrate
Would it be acceptable to update the requirements to Maven 2.0.9? The reason is
that I would like to drop the section in the root pom.xml
in
favor of default plugin versions bundled in Maven since 2.0.9. The reason for
that is that we do not upgrate our plugins version often and aggregated jav
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/496/changes
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use p
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/495/changes
Changes:
[desruisseaux] Pushed the verifier in later phase, from "compile" to "verify".
--
started
Updating http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/gt
U build/maven/pom.xml
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> We won't know until we try. I was thinking of doing something more crazy
> then just collecting the jars; ie there is too much API exposed if we
> just collect up what we have. We really need to take a small portion of
> geoapi.jar; and a small portion of gt-api.jar ...
Added "gt-" prefix to modules that produce a JAR. I would recommand developpers
to performs the following steps in this order (this is not really necessary -
only cleaner):
* mvn clean
* delete the .m2/repository/org/geotools/ directory
* svn update
* mvn install
I have added a new Maven plugi
Following module:
modules/unsupported/wps
was totally empty (contained just a "pom.xml" and nothing else - no scr
directory), was not included in the build and had no significant change for one
year or so, and was conflicting with extension/xsd/wps. I removed it.
Following module:
modul
Can anyone supply me with an example of datatypes that have no
extentions, so that in an imageio ImageReader Service Provider the
MIMETypes and suffixes don't make a sense? That could be the case
where the format instead depends on a particular datastructure.
Thanks,
Andrea
--
Reminding: if no body object, I'm going to process in the next few hours:
> * Do not touch to directory names.
> * Add the "gt-" prefix in leaves modules only.
> * Remove all elements.
> * Reinsert and elements.
Martin
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
