Pretty cool stuff andrea. I don't have much to add beyond what you
and jody have discussed. Looking forward to checking it out.
Jesse
On 22-Dec-08, at 11:15 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> so I'm looking into the details of contributing the
> improved labeller I've developed for GeoServer
> ba
Hi all,
I put together a patch for the capabilities improvement described in
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2257 . It's attached to the
issue. One problem that jdeolive brought up during a quick review was
the question of what the default implementation should return. Justin
advocated
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I downloaded the NADCON grid files from
> http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PC_PROD/NADCON/ and I'm considering to include
> them in the JAR file of GeoTools referencing module, as an optional
> plugin. If I'm understanding right, it is in the public domain because
> it is U.
Pass down rendering hints while building buffered images used for graphic
fills/strokes
---
Key: GEOT-2259
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2259
Project: Geo
TTFMarkFactory braks mark positioning convention
Key: GEOT-2260
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2260
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
R
Graphic fills based on marks are drawn upside down
--
Key: GEOT-2261
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2261
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
Affec
Graphic fills based on mark objects are not working
---
Key: GEOT-2262
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2262
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
Aff
Marks are drawn upside down
---
Key: GEOT-2263
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2263
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
Affects Versions: 2.5.2
Reporter: Andre
Support basic hatched fills
---
Key: GEOT-2264
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2264
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
Affects Versions: 2.5.2
Reporter: Andre
Sounds like a good time Andrea - and yes I am interested. Can you make
an jira issue so this change shows up in the release notes; I would also
ask that we add an XML Fragment to the user guide based on your email here.
Jody
Aside: Were the bugs in the renderer interesting? Or just silly mistake
Jody,
I think we'd have to approach Vivid Solutions to get any part of
OpenJUMP released via LGPL. Based on my previous interactions with
Vivid I'm not sure if this would be possible. But I could check with
one of the guys from Vivid about the possibility.
I should probably run this by the OJ dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
