Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.4 release heads up

Hi Justin, I need some days for additional usability improvements of the imagemosaic-jdbc plugin. Since this will be the first geoserver release containing the imagemosiac-jdbc plugin, I want to improve the handling of the module and make the tutorial simpler. (I got some feedback from

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.4 release heads up

I will hurry up, are 3 days ok ? Justin Deoliveira writes: Hi Christian, Sure, do you know how long you will need? If it is more than a few days what do you think about creating the 2.5.4 tag, and porting changes you are making back to it? And we can always update the imagemosaic-jdbc

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2361) Provide better support for some Oracle string types

Provide better support for some Oracle string types --- Key: GEOT-2361 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2361 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: data

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2362) Improve handling of NUMERIC and DECIMAL types

Improve handling of NUMERIC and DECIMAL types - Key: GEOT-2362 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2362 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: data jdbc-ng

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.4 release heads up

Yeah, I can wait a couple of days. Although I would like to start the release early next week. So if it is going to take longer I think i will create the gt release tag, port your changes to it, then do the official release. Any objections? Christian Müller wrote: I will hurry up, are 3 days

Re: [Geotools-devel] Namespace support

ListName is the way to go; we need some control over attribute order in the result (at least to be able to match XML schemas where such a thing has been defined using a sequence. I actually wonder if this is an area where we could simplify our model some - I am still waiting for an unordered

[Geotools-devel] One week extension to FOSS4G workshop and tutorials submissions

Sydney, Australia. 2 March 2009. In response to requests from presenters, the deadline for the FOSS4G 2009 workshop and tutorial abstract submissions has been extended by one week, to Monday 9 March 2009. If you are considering submitting a workshop, please notify your intent by emailing the

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2363) Postgres EPSG factory won't work against Postgres 8.3

Postgres EPSG factory won't work against Postgres 8.3 - Key: GEOT-2363 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2363 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: core

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1420

See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1420/changes Changes: [jive] switch to geoapi 2.3-SNAPSHOT -- [...truncated 7608 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] Building Geometries

Re: [Geotools-devel] Call for GeoAPI dependency upgrate: any objection?

Committed on trunk; I have deployed GeoAPI SNAPSHOT as well. Jody Martin Desruisseaux wrote: Justin Deoliveira a écrit : This only affects geotools trunk correct? If so there should be no issues from our side. Yes, as suggested by Jody GeoTools 2.5 stay unchanged on GeoAPI

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1420

It hates me but it is also building with -Dall; going to try and reproduce on my end. Jody Hudson wrote: See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1420/changes Changes: [jive] switch to geoapi 2.3-SNAPSHOT

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1421

See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1421/changes Changes: [mbedward] new pom.xml [mbedward] First cut on revision of JMapPane and related classes. Selection and highlighting methods absent at the moment (yet another attempt at commit -sorry)